|
Other Letters:
No 25-30
No 31-36
No
37-41
No
42-48
No 49-60
No 61-69
No 70-79
No 80-89
No 90-100
No 101-109
No 110-119
No 120-129
No 130-139
No 140-149
No 150-159
No 160-169
No 170-179
No 180-189
No 190-199
No 200-209
No 210-219
No 220-229
No 230-239
No 240-249
No 250-259
No 260-270
Partnership
in Conflict
Support Jayyous
|
Circular Letter No 249 21st January 2006
Sunday January 8th.
On the national level, all the news is concerned with the health of Mr
Sharon.
On the local level, there is a story in Haaretz 8th January P2, which is
related to one of the places which was mentioned in last week’s letter.
“W. Bank villagers: 120 olive trees destroyed.” ‘Some 120 olive trees
belonging to a Palestinian family were cut down in the southern Hebron
hills, the family said, Friday. The olive grove is located across from
the West Bank village of Tawaneh (also spelled as Tuwani), and belongs
to a family from the village of Yata. Children from Tawaneh discovered
the mutilated trees on Friday morning, and informed the landowners, the
Amur family. Police and Civil Administration officials arrived at the
scene, as did the security co-ordinator for settlements in the area. …
The isolated grove is on the northern side of Route 317, a road that the
Palestinians are in effect barred form using, and which links the
settlements in the region.’ [It was while just crossing this road that
the two Palestinians mentioned in last week’s letter were stopped by
Israeli soldiers and had their ID cards taken.]
Monday January 9th.
Haaretz January 9th P3. “Mazuz [Attorney General]: Government should
compensate Palestinians for damages to olive trees.” ‘The state should
pay financial compensation to Palestinians whose olive trees have been
cut down, and then sue the vandals, on top of indicting them, in order
to recoup the costs, Attorney General Menachem Mazuz told the cabinet
yesterday. Mazuz told the cabinet that some 2,400 Palestinians trees
have been chopped down in recent months at various locations in the West
Bank, apparently by Jewish settlers. “There’s a feeling of lawlessness,
that what is most violent prevails.” He said. “This phenomenon is one
element of the broader phenomenon of a lack of appropriate law
enforcement against Israelis in the territories. … I can’t accept the
response of insufficient resources,” Mazuz added. “This is a matter of
priorities. It is impossible to accept that the State of Israel is
incapable of devoting the necessary resources to this.” The B’Tselem
human rights organisation, which has frequently protested the state’s
failure to protect Palestinian olive orchards, said in response to the
cabinet discussion that now that the authorities have finally
acknowledged the problem’s existence, it hopes that they will take real
action to solve it.’
Last year, donations enabled us to buy olive trees for a family in
Jayyous, whose trees had been cut down by the Israeli army. The cost was
NIS 1,000 per tree ( approx £125 per tree) At that price, the cost to
the Palestinian community of the trees which the Attorney General
acknowledges have been cut down is approx £300,000. It may not sound
much to some folk, but on the West Bank that is a fortune.
As I have said on many occasions, it is difficult to divide people here
up into “good guys” and “bad guys”. For some, it is enough that the
people who are alleged to have destroyed the trees are Jewish for them
to blacken the name of every Jewish person. For others, it is enough
that the trees were not completely destroyed to allege, as did some
leaders of the Settlers, that the Palestinians damaged their own trees.
They say that it is well known that no-one can trust Palestinians.
The trees were badly damaged, but it turned out that they could perhaps
be “rescued” with proper care. It may be that in 5 or 6 years they might
be able to produce a harvest. The folk who went down to the village to
help the people deal with their trees were members of Rabbis for Human
Rights – Jewish people who are profoundly religious, and who say that it
is their faith which makes them totally committed to justice for the
Palestinians. On which side are the “good guys” and which side the “bad
guys.”?
Speaking to someone in Hebron this week about the olive tree incident at
Towani, he said that he had spoken with the Israeli army about the
incident. To his question about why the Israeli army had not been aware
of the cutting of the trees, the reply was given that there had been no
patrols in that area on that night, as they had no driver for a vehicle
to go on patrol.
I often suggest that people might write to their MP or other public
representative about what is happening in this part of the world. One
person who did is a Pastor in Wales. He collected a petition from his
folk and sent it off to the British Government. Below is part of an
e-mail that I received this week, with names etc deleted.
“The MP for Swansea West, Alan Williams, has forwarded the reply of Kim
Howells, Minister of State in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, to
the petition I sent concerning the situation in Bethlehem…
9 January 2005
Thank you for your letter of 28 November to the Foreign Secretary on
behalf of your constituent, Mr X, … about the situation in Israel and
the Occupied Territories. I am replying as Minister of State responsible
for our relations with the Middle East.
I share Mr X’s concern about the Israeli Barrier. The continued conflict
between Israel and the Palestinians causes untold hardships for the
people on both sides as well as instability at the heart of the Middle
East. Progress towards a resolution of the conflict is a foreign policy
priority for this Government. We now have an opportunity to move
forward, which we must seize.
We appreciate the interest among UK stakeholders and the public in this
crucial foreign policy issue. As part of our commitment to greater
access to government information we have published all the most
frequently requested information on our policies towards Israel and
Palestine on our website at www.fco.gpv.uk. You can find the information
in the “Countries and Regions” section, under “Middle East Process”. Our
web pages also provide political and historical information, the
Government’s position on current developments and analysis of key issues
facing the region.”
It is good to know that someone in the UK Government shares some
concerns about the Israeli Barrier.
Below is part of a rather different e-mail, from people also concerned
about the Barrier, but who, perhaps because they live here, are trying
to do something about it. (Perhaps I am being a bit unfair in implying
that governments such as the UK government are not trying to do
something about it.) Once again, this is an example of Israeli Jewish
people working with Palestinians to try to stop the Wall.
Three thousand take part in non-violent protest (in the village of
Bil’in), and the army gets mad.
Adam Keller's action report on the protest march in Bil'in today (Jan.
20). Links to other reports in the end.
In the streets of Bil'in, like anywhere in the Palestinian Territories
these days, every available flat surface is totally covered with many
layers of elections posters.
Indeed, the Bil'in anti-wall march has itself become an active arena of
electioneering. Bil'in, with its proud ongoing struggle against the
Wall, has become very much of a symbol for all Palestinians. The
contending parties have all sent high-ranking candidates to march at the
front. And among the signs and banners in the gathering crowd, the
colours and emblems of major and minor political parties outnumber the
Palestinian national flags. Meanwhile, more and more of the Palestinian
yellow taxis arrive at the square outside the Bil'in mosque, disgorging
Israeli activists, altogether, some three hundred. A big Hebrew/English
banner, "The Wall Must Fall" is unfurled. Among the handwritten signs
brought from Tel-Aviv, there is a dominant new theme: "The Fence route
serves the real-estate sharks"; "The contractors steal land, we pay with
blood"; "the Fence - armed robbery". In recent weeks, there have been
increasing revelations about the very questionable way that Bil'in lands
have been "sold" for use as settler habitations, and the considerable
amounts of money which some people gained in the process.
Walking through the narrow streets of Bil'in, with welcoming faces and
waving children at every window, is always a warm, rather light-hearted
experience. Today especially so, due to the large influx of Israelis,
internationals and also many Palestinians from outside Bil'in.
But, like every Friday, the tension could be felt as soon as the march
got outside the shelter of the houses entering the open fields -towards
the Fence and the waiting soldiers. The confrontation started early.
Even before the entire march had gotten to the fence, the dull
explosions were heard from the front, and tear gas canisters started
whistling overhead.
"Trigger-happy today, are they?" remarked a young Englishwoman. She
stood her ground, covering her face with a scarf. "Don't run.
Hyperventilation makes it worse". Not everybody was that cool, but
Israeli and Palestinian organizers were stopping the stampede, urgently
calling out: "Turn Right! Turn Right!". Turning right meant going
northwards, parallel to the Fence, towards the sector where it has not
yet been built up and where crossing is possible. Soldiers were rushing,
to head off the new line of march. Behind, Palestinian medics were
taking an unconscious young man to a waiting ambulance.”
Thursday 19th January I had to go to Idna on a specific errand. As has
been the case for the last few times that we went there, the main road
into the village has been blocked off by the Israeli army, so we had to
take a dirt road. There had been quite a bit of rain, so it was
interesting driving it. We got there, and back! – and the car was
considerably heavier with the load of mud that it was carrying. But, as
I and countless others keep saying : Why block a main road in the name
of “security” when minor roads are left open? Perish the thought, but
perhaps closing a road is not a matter of “security”.
In the village, we did our business with the women of the Co-operative.
We then had a chance to sit and talk. For us, Bethlehem is perhaps 30
kms from Idna – a matter of a few minutes. One of the women set out the
other day to take a box of embroidery to Bethlehem to arrange for it to
be shipped overseas. On the way, the minibus was stopped by an Israeli
army patrol, and the passengers were told to get out. It was cold, and
raining – the soldiers had their warm, weather-proof gear. They kept the
people outside the bus for 30 minutes. When eventually they were allowed
back into the bus, the woman with her parcel decided that she would go
back home, and try again another day. She got to Bethlehem the next day.
Goodness knows how many hours that task required. Also double fares – a
total of almost $25. Someone has to pay for that, and the embroideries
are already on the expensive side.
Elections are round the corner. One wonders what will be the outcome –
it seems certain that Hamas will do well – echoes of all the
“terrorists” who have contested elections and done well – Kenya, Zambia,
Malawi, Ghana and so on.
Three quotations from people I have listened to recently: The Rev Mitri
Raheb, Lutheran pastor in Bethlehem: “Pilgrims coming to the Holy Land
often run where Jesus walked.” (Referring to the speed with which
pilgrims travel round the places associated with Jesus.)
“We know how to die together, but not how to live together.” A former
Chief Rabbi speaking at a Reception in Jerusalem, referring to the two
major communities in this land, and their seeming inability to find a
way to live together.
“When all the animals in Noah’s Ark were in the Ark, they were able to
live together. The trouble started when they went out of the Ark. How
can we re-create an Ark?” The same former Chief Rabbi.
Stay well. God bless
Joan and Clarence
Top
Circular Letter No 248 7th January 2006
Listening to the new broadcasts this morning, there are still the
regular reports on the condition of Mr. Sharon. Will he survive? Will he
die? Will he be incapacitated? What will be the effect on Israeli
politics of his illness and his probable inability to return to active
political life? What will be the effect on relations between Israel and
Palestine and what is euphemistically called “The Peace Process”?
Regardless of what people say and how people assess his contribution to
the life of this region, our travels in the past couple of days on the
West Bank leave us in no doubt as to the intention of the current
political and military leadership of Israel to continue to exercise
almost total control over the West Bank, in terms of the ability of the
population to move around. More of that later.
Saturday 31st December. Anger perhaps is not the best companion for
writing – perhaps indignation would be better. However, there is a deal
of anger around, both at what we have seen in the past couple of days,
and at the seeming inability of the world community to comprehend what
is being done here, and impotence (or desire) to do anything about it.
Some time ago, there was what seemed a ludicrous suggestion from the
Government of Israel that the EU, or any other international body,
finance the construction of an “Alternative Road System” on the West
Bank for the use of Palestinians, so that there would be two sets of
roads – one for Israeli Jewish users and the other for Palestinian
users. However far-fetched the idea may have seemed, it is in many
places a reality.
Today, we drove down the main road from Jerusalem to Hebron. We then
turned off on Route 35 to go to Idna. Hardly a vehicle was on the road,
- little Jewish traffic as it was Shabbat, and little Palestinian
traffic. When we got to Idna, one of the reasons for the lack of
Palestinian traffic become clear – the entrance to the village was
completely blocked by concrete blocks about 1 metre cubed. That is the
main entrance and exit from a “village” of at least 17,000 people If
they want to get to Hebron, they have two choices – back roads to the
East of the main road, or a back road to the West of the main road. To
get to it, they have to come by taxi to the blocked exit of their
village, walk across the main road and through similar blocks at the
entrance to the village of Tarqumya, and there get a taxi to follow the
second-class road to Hebron.
Sunday 1st January. Today, after we had had lunch here in Jerusalem,
with folk from the congregation, including Helen Shehadeh, we went to
Beit Jala to take her home. As we had a small package to deliver in Beit
Sahour, a sort of continuation to the East of Bethlehem, we decided to
keep going on that road to get back to Jerusalem. It is a lonely road,
down and up the precipitous sides of a Wadi, but with a fair amount of
traffic. This is all traffic within the West Bank, travelling from one
Palestinian Village to another. To get from any part of that area into
Jerusalem, entails going to a checkpoint. However, just to show their
control, even on that road the Israeli army has created yet another
checkpoint. There are not too many folk like us who pass that way, and
so the Border Police were a little bit unsure who we were and what we
were doing there. They were also as deficient in English as we were in
Hebrew. However, after sitting for a few minutes, we were able to drive
on. Eventually, the road came to The Wall – and we drove alongside this
8-metre high monstrosity, on a good paved road put in by the Israeli
government, to ease the plight of the Palestinians. We finally came to
what had been one of the main roads from East Jerusalem to Jericho – now
totally blocked by The Wall. We were within 1 km of the top of the Mount
of Olives. Eventually, 13 kms later, having had to make a long detour
and pass another checkpoint, we reached it.
Both of us were angry. However, there was one bright moment in the
afternoon’s journey. At the Checkpoint in what seemed like the middle of
nowhere were two Jewish women standing, keeping watch. They were members
of Machsomwatch, an organisation which we know and which we have been
glad to help in the past. They were there to monitor the way in which
the Israeli soldiers treated the Palestinians as they passed through the
Checkpoint. If the concrete bollards and walls are the face of Israeli
officialdom, then the two women were the faces of what I understand to
be a much more authentic Judaism. Their presence, and the presence of so
many other members of Machsomwatch at checkpoints up and down the West
Bank, is like a poppy blooming in the rubble of a battle field. We
quietly blessed their presence.
Tuesday 3rd January. Perhaps one is over-sensitive to the language that
is used on TV news programmes. This morning, at 0830 hours our time, BBC
World gave its headlines, among them one about the forthcoming
Palestinian Elections, with the comment that “they may be postponed.”
There was no explanation given, and an average listener might then have
been critical of the Palestinians for even contemplating postponing
elections. The fact was that the principal reason for even considering
postponement on that occasion was the suggestion by the Israeli
Government that it would prevent Palestinians living in East Jerusalem
from voting. Certainly to me, the impression given by the headline was
detrimental to the Palestinians with not a word about the policy of the
Israeli government which is materially affecting the position.
Wednesday 4th January. I have mentioned before the village of Tuwani.
This word village can be quite misleading at times. It is used to refer
to Idna, where there is a population of over 17,000 people. It is also
used to refer to Tuwani, where the population might reach 170 adults.
With the Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland I
had visited the village, which is south of Hebron, at the beginning of
November, and had made an undertaking to go back and talk with some of
the leaders of the village. It is a small community, and quite isolated.
Less than a kilometre away there is a Settlement, whose inhabitants have
been quite aggressive to the villagers.
Today, we went back – 4 of us from the Church of Scotland, 1 Israeli
Jewish woman from Machsomwatch, and 1 Israeli Jewish man from Tayyush.
The purpose of our visit was to renew our acquaintance with the people
of the village, and also to see what practical help we could offer. We
were in a position to offer some financial help as we had received a
donation with the particular request that it be used to support some
project or community in the Hebron area.
We met the woman who is in charge of the Women’s Project, which is
perhaps a rather formal name for what is still a relatively informal
group of women. They are trying to develop sales of embroidery as a way
of helping them find income to bring up their families. Their meeting
place also serves as a centre where they can have space for themselves
as women, and play a fuller part in the life of the village.
We met a couple of men of the village also, and talked with them about
completing the construction of a small area beside the existing room in
which the women keep their products, and which is also beside the small
building which is used by members of the Christian Peacemakers Team as
their living quarters.
We were able to agree to offer some financial help for both the
construction of the covered work area, and for the purchasing of
materials for the women to embroider.
Having completed that part of our work, I was asked if I would take two
men some distance along the road to a checkpoint. Our leaders were the
two Israeli Jewish people who had come with us to Tuwani. The reason for
having to take the two men to the checkpoint was to try to get back
their ID cards from the Israeli soldiers. The story was as follows. The
men live in a village on one side of Route 317, which is regarded as
“Israel” and is normally closed to Palestinian traffic. They crossed
over to Tuwani village, and were on their way home across the road when
they were stopped by an Israeli army patrol. Their offence was being in
Israel without permits. Their ID cards were taken. The army apparently
has the authority to hold their cards for 4 hours for checking. It was
night, it was cold, and the men had to go home without their cards. They
contacted the person with whom we were visiting Tuwani, and he had
already contacted the army. He had made some sort of agreement to go
with the men to collect their ID cards from the nearest checkpoint. This
we did – but the soldiers on duty said they had no information about the
matter. We drove on to the next, main, checkpoint, where once again the
soldiers on duty said they had no knowledge of the matter. We had no
alternative but to go back to Tuwani, and the men went home.
Even while in our car on the road, as they had no papers, they could
have been hassled. Without our presence, they would have been very
vulnerable indeed. I do not know how the story eventually ended –
probably some time later with the men getting their ID cards back. In
the meantime, they were as good as stateless.
Such is the reality of life for ordinary Palestinian folk.
Friday 6th January. We went to Jayyous – again to offer some financial
support made possible by donations from people who had visited Jayyous
while on the visit for the 75 anniversary of St Andrew’s. We were able
to make a contribution towards the cost of getting a Child Care project
started. As usually happens, we met Abdullatif and he was our host. At
one stage he was quite agitated, as he recounted his story of leaving
Nablus the previous day. He had come to the checkpoint; he approached
the soldier and asked to be allowed to pass reasonably quickly – he
wanted to get home and he had a lot of shopping in preparation for the
Muslim feast next week. The soldier started to shout at him, and told
him to “go f—k your mother.” Those who have met Abdullatif can well
understand how he felt – he said that he barely slept on Thursday night.
Travelling with us that day was a Jewish man from Canada. He sat and
talked for a long time with one of the men of the village. In the car on
the way back home, he recounted some of his conversation. His own
father, a Jewish man from Poland, had escaped from German concentration
camps, and had ended up in Siberia working in a commune there. On
returning to Poland, he had been advised to get out, and fortunately
managed to do so. The Palestinian with whom the Canadian was talking
spoke of the 2 months during which he had undergone interrogation in an
Israeli prison. His father, an old man, had been so severely
interrogated, that he had not long survived the ordeal. It was a moving
encounter between two men whose fathers had been persecuted. It was
moving to hear the Jewish man speak of his feelings at the way his
fellow Jewish people were treating other human beings.
Saturday 7th January. Last journey for the week was to the village of
Rantis, which we had visited once before in 2000. Again, it was offering
some financial support for the work of the women’s group. We had a walk
around the village, and on the way back to the women’s centre, we were
looking up at the hill some way beyond the village. It had 30 or 40
houses neatly set on it, with red roofs – a quintessential Settlement. I
cannot imagine how people whose land has been taken must feel when they
get up each day and see these houses, the symbols of occupation.
Our way home took us past Modi’in, not far from Ben Gurion Airport.
Haaretz Tuesday Jan 3rd P1 :”Despite Court order against building in
Modi’in Illit neighbourhood, Civil Administration admits “Permits issued
to create facts on ground.” ‘The Military Government’s Civil
Administration chief planner, Shlomo Moskovitch, admitted the building
permits for the next neighbourhood Natiyahu East in Modi’in Illit were
issued illegally. The project is being built on land belonging to the
Palestinian village of Bil’in.’
Such are the realities of life in a system which Mr Sharon has done much
to create.
Stay well. God bless. Joan and Clarence
Top
Circular Letter No 247 30th December 2005
This should have been written last week, in time for Christmas. But
sometimes, it is hard to sit down and write about what is really
happening, and to try to cope with the realities of the situation here.
Realities like a bus load of members of the Lutheran Church in
Bethlehem, who had permits to allow them to visit any part of Israel
apart from Eilat. Sandra Olewine, an American Methodist minister working
with the Lutheran Church in Bethlehem has recounted the story of the
day. “Every year the church council presents small gifts to the children
of the congregation. This year we decided, though, to take them on a
trip to the north of the country as many of our children had never been
there. The day would include a stop at the Jordan River for a time to
remember our baptism, a visit and hike at Caesarea Philippi (Banias) to
see the headwaters of the Jordan River, a visit to the Mount of
Beatitudes, ending the day with a boat ride on the Sea of Galilee and a
fish dinner on the shore!” They duly travelled along the Jordan Valley
until they reached the new “checkpoint” at the northern end of the West
Bank, where people pass into Israel. For the likes of us, with our
foreign passports, it presents little difficulty. However, for Sandra
and the children, arrival at the checkpoint was the beginning of a
shattered dream. Sandra writes: “The young Israeli soldier (on duty at
the checkpoint) announced "Palestinians can't use this checkpoint. You
have to go back and go another way if you want to go north." 'Another
way' would have entailed any where from 2 - 4 hours more driving,
basically getting us to the Sea of Galilee not much before our 4 pm boat
ride and dinner! Thus began a forty minute negotiation between myself
and the soldiers. Using all the typical methods one uses in such
circumstances - being nice, being parental, joking, yelling, phone calls
to 'higher' authorities, calling on good cheer of the holidays, throwing
a tantrum, shaming and reasoning - I tried everything I could think of
to convince these young men of the insanity of what they were asking us
to do. When one of the soldiers made a wise crack about our children
wanting to go to Tiberius to play with explosives, the other two
soldiers told him to be quiet as I proceeded to remind him the only ones
with explosive devises were he and his colleagues in uniform.
Clearly this had nothing to do with security as they weren't telling us
we couldn't go - we just couldn't go through the direct way. At one
point I asked the soldier who took the lead in dealing with me, "Do you
realize what it is you're exactly telling me? I have one day to take
these children to the Sea to play and you're asking me to spend the
entire day on the bus. You realize that this has nothing to do with
security but is only meant to harass and humiliate people?" His answer,
"I know. But, this is the rule. It isn't up to me." I reminded him that
such rationale was a slippery slope.
The day proceeded with the bus retracing its steps down the Jordan
Valley, abandoning the trip to the Galilee, and instead spending time at
the Dead Sea and its environs.
Realities like the Wall and the Checkpoint at Bethlehem. No problem for
us to pass through. But what is it saying about us as a human family? As
an Israeli State? As a would-be Palestinian State? My experience of the
Wall and the checkpoints is comparatively benign, but there was a
harrowing article in Haaretz on December 28th Page 5 entitled “It’s not
all in the details” by Amira Hass. She wrote about the “humanitarian”
checkpoint at Kalandia on the way to Ramallah. If you can find it on the
Haaretz website, it would be worth spending a few minutes reading it,
and then perhaps writing to the Israeli Embassy in your country to ask
about it.
Realities like the young man who has serviced my computer for a couple
of years, and who used to live just round the corner. When I needed help
recently he said that he was busy and could not come for a day or two.
His “business” was unpacking in his new home – in the Settlement of
Eleazar south of Bethlehem. He waxed lyrical about the place and the
panoramic view from his windows – totally oblivious of the fact that the
countryside over which he was looking belonged, among others, to members
of our congregation. They have been fighting for a decade to keep
possession of their land – now an immigrant from England married to an
immigrant from South Africa, is able to enjoy the view which the State
of Israel wishes to take from them, people who have been born here.
Realities like the tenders that have been put out for the construction
of 228 new homes in Settlements on the West Bank. Although the Road Map
stipulates that construction should cease, the interpretation put on
this by the Government of Israel is that construction in new settlements
should stop, but that construction in existing settlements can continue.
Yet, to go back to Christmas.
On Christmas Eve, we went to Bethlehem as we have done for each of the
past 5 years, to share in the welcome given to the Latin Patriarch. The
wind was bitterly cold, and despite what was reported on the media, we
thought that the crowds were not all that large. One person with whom we
chatted said that there had been a threat on the Internet for an attack
by a suicide bomber, and so people had stayed away.
However, the people who were there were cheerful and friendly – this was
one of “their” days, when they welcomed the Patriarch to their town.
That evening, the rain came, in torrents. I had visions of a very small
congregation for the Watchnight Service. How wrong I was – it was the
largest congregation in the years that we have been here. As usual, it
was overwhelmingly Jewish. Our Christian faith has its roots in the
Jewish faith, and so we started there, and worked through some of the
prophets to come to the birth of Jesus. Who knows what impact such a
service may have – suffice it to say that there was one young man who
had come from Haifa to be there, and who greeted me with the request
that he be able to light a candle for his girlfriend. We found a candle
for him, and he was so happy. The candles on our Advent Wreath were lit
by a Jewish man from Toronto, an English man who had last been in the
church some 60 years ago when he was serving as a British soldier in
Jerusalem, the young Jewish man from Haifa, and Alice Abusharr, who was,
I suspect, one of the few people there who had actually been born in
Jerusalem.
One of the highlights of the Christmas season for us is to accept Helen
Shehadeh’s invitation to Al Shurooq School for the Visually Handicapped
in Beit Jala for Christmas lunch, and then to share in the coming of
Santa Claus to the school. We had front row seats for his arrival, and
the kids sat so patiently while singing their carols. Eventually Santa
arrived, more songs were sung, a bit of “dancing”, and then it was gift
time. Each child’s name was called out, and most made their way to the
front to receive their gift from Santa. Then they went back to their
seats, and waited for all the gifts to be handed out before any of them
started to open their parcels. In a sighted community, one often speaks
of the sparkling eyes of the kids as they receive their gifts. Here, the
eyes were, for the most part, sightless, but the faces were shining and
full of joy.
As it was Thursday, those children who could go home were also getting
ready to leave, and the mother of one of them came in to sit and wait.
It was fascinating to watch her involvement in the party, and to wonder
what she, a Muslim woman, made of it all. All the parents know that they
are sending their children to a school with a definite Christian ethos,
and if they objected, they could send their children to the State school
in Bethlehem. Yet, they decide to send them to Al Shurooq.
As we watched the joy of the children this week, my mind went back to
Ramadan, when there were just a few children in the school who were not
able to go home to Gaza. They came down and sat with some of us there,
and then they sang for us. “We shall overcome some day” was the song
which brought tears to our eyes and lumps to our throats.
Christmas gifts have come from many places – donations to help with “our
work”.
There was support for the building project that Al Shurooq is trying to
get under way.
There was support for a Child Care facility in Jayyous, to enable women
with young children to go to work, - an essential feature of life where
work for men may not be available.
There was support for medical treatment for the young boy with the hip
deformities.
There was support for further medical treatment for the young girl
Sukran whom we were able to help a few years ago.
There was support for Christmas parties for children.
There was support for a family whose house has been virtually surrounded
by the Wall, as one approaches Rachel’s Tomb.
Your support went to Christian and Muslim families – sometimes through a
Christian person, at other times through a Jewish person.
Our Christmas Card, as was also the case with so many others, expressed
a hope for a Happy New Year, of a Good New Year, of a Peaceful New Year.
In our Watchnight Service, I asked those present to think about the New
Year. How could it be “New” in any sense other than a date being
changed, as there were the same people, the same policies, the same
conflicts – at least in this part of the world. “Newness” certainly
seems a long way away, when there is a suicide bomber at the end of the
West Bank, and kidnapping in Gaza; when there is shelling and
assassinations; when there are the extensions of the Occupation.
So, maybe we should forget about the New Year bit, because the chance of
anything new is remote.
But, does our faith give us the luxury to adopt such an approach? I
started by talking about Realities. And let me finish by continuing to
talk about Reality. For one of our Scripture readings in the New Year’s
Eve service, we will look at the verse in the New Testament : “If anyone
is in Christ, there is a new creation.” That is the only Reality which
we have to offer – being “Christlike” is the only thing that will bring
about a change here, and wherever you are.
May we all have the grace to be more Christ-like in the coming year than
we have been in the past.
Thank you all for your cards, your letters, your e-mails this Christmas,
and for all your support in the past year, which has meant so much to
many folk who live a bit better, because of the work of the “Scottish
Church”
Blessings in 2006.
Joan and Clarence
Top
Circular Letter No 246 17th December 2005
I started Letter No 245 by telling of the detour which I had had to
make when taking a group of people to Hebron, as what is called “The
Tunnels Road” leading from Jerusalem south towards Hebron, by-passing
Bethlehem, had been closed.
The internet edition of Haaretz this morning carries a story of
co-operation between the security forces of the Palestinian Authority
and the Israeli army which foiled an attempt by some Palestinians to
place a car loaded with explosive material in one of the tunnels. There
were traffic jams and disruption for several hours due to the road being
closed. The car was located before it could be placed in the tunnel, and
the Israeli army was able to carry out a controlled explosion on it. Had
it been detonated in the tunnel, it would have had a very significant
effect not only on transport, but also on the Settlers living south of
Bethlehem. It would also have given added impetus to the construction of
the Wall in that area, to completely close off that part of Beit Jala
from access to the main road south the Hebron.
I have consistently maintained over the years that we do not feel in any
particular danger here, and so have also consistently encouraged people
to come and visit here. In one way, the story above would seem to
question my assertion of not feeling at risk. Yet, it also shows a
degree of co-operation between Palestinian and Israeli forces which has
not always been the case. It shows the degree to which both communities
are in a sense inter-dependent, and they need to work with each other.
Such co-operation has not so far extended to granting a blind, 70-year
old woman, a permit to travel to join her church in worship on Sunday.
Once again this week, Helen Shehadeh’s efforts to renew her permit to
come to Jerusalem have failed. While this sort of treatment of someone
like Helen is maddening, it is just one more example of an attitude held
by some of the soldiers in the Israeli Army. Whether they are following
out orders from more senior offices, of whether they are just being
obstructionist, it is hard to know.
However, a much more serious matter of life and death was the subject of
a report in Haaretz on Thursday Dec 15th, P3. The headline was: “Report
; Separation fence making patients and hospitals suffer.” ‘The section
of the West Bank separation fence surrounding Jerusalem seriously
impinges on the accessibility and quality of medical services received
by tens of thousands of Palestinian East Jerusalem, West Bank, and Gaza
residents, according to a report released yesterday by Physicians for
Human Rights – Israel. … Since the roadblocks were set up at the
entrances to Jerusalem at the end of 2000, and more acutely since the
construction of the separation wall in the north and south, the number
of sick people who manage to get to the hospitals in the city has
greatly decreased. … For instance, M., a 71-year old woman from the
Daheisha refugee camp near Bethlehem suffering from kidney problems and
diabetes, requires dialysis under a doctor’s supervision three times a
week – a service unavailable near her home. However, she said that after
she refused to surrender her wanted son to security officials she was
banned from entering Jerusalem and has not received necessary medical
treatment for several weeks. … “The separation fence causes outrageous
injustice,” the Report concluded, adding that preventing people from
receiving treatment “will only increase the hatred and violence in our
region.”’
Who is right – the fighter on one side who refuses to grant permits for
patients to get to medical treatment, or the fighter on the other side
who says that it is legitimate to attack a road which he and his people
are excluded from using?
For those going into Bethlehem this Christmas, and perhaps for those
coming out – depending on the decision of the Israeli army about which
hole in the wall they will be able to use – there will be the experience
of the new checkpoint. I met with some overseas visitors this week who
have been on a visit to The Holy Land. Their itinerary had been arranged
for them by a Travel Agent, and they had had a comprehensive tour of the
“Holy Sites”. Their last visit had been to Bethlehem. Their Israeli
Jewish guide took them to the checkpoint, but as it is illegal for him
to enter Bethlehem he had arranged for a Palestinian guide to meet them
and take them round Bethlehem. At the end of their visit, they had the
experience of going through the metal turnstiles etc. They were
appalled, felt degraded, and certainly did not feel that people were
being encouraged to visit Bethlehem.
There was an article this week – Haaretz Thursday Dec 15th P5 – entitled
“No longer in the way to Efrat” by Meron Benvenisti. ‘In another few
days, Bethlehem will once again, for one night, win the world’s
attention. Only a few of the hundreds of millions of Christmas
celebrants will spend the night in the city of the Nazarene’s birth, but
that will be a symbol of the desire for peace that beats in the hearts
of all humans, from all religions. The few who do reach Manger Square
and take part in the midnight mass will not be able to avoid wondering
about their experiences at two opposing places that symbolise Bethlehem
in 2005 – the Church of the Nativity and Rachel’s Crossing. The first
symbolised the hope that emerged with the birth of the baby, and the
second represents alienation, hostility and aggression. ... A lot of
architectural advice, engineering, security know-how and especially many
dozens of millions of shekels were invested in building this monument to
Israeli arbitrariness. The “corrals” – revolving steel doors, electric
gates, exposed concrete corridors supervised from above, the X-ray
installations – exude horror. “I felt like a cow, it was very
threatening, very sterile,” said an American tourist. … A border
crossing between Bethlehem and Jerusalem? What perverse geography builds
a border between those two twin cities? … Anyone building a wall between
himself and the Church of the Nativity sends a message of aversion to
the sanctities of Christianity, the traditions of the gentiles. …. The
huge walls, the sealed iron doors, the road system, the “crossing’s
facilities” and equipment all communicate fear, closures and aggression.
Sorely lacking from the group that built the complex was a person with
enough sensitivity to the historical and religious background of
Bethlehem’s borders, who would have helped prevent the cultural and
environmental disaster that was created. But who would even listen to
such a person?’
This is rather a long quotation, but I used it for three reasons :
a) it is written by a Jewish writer, speaking with great pain of the
actions of his own community;
b) it is describing the realities as they now exist at Bethlehem;
c) when we speak of Bethlehem this Christmas time, we will have the
image of this checkpoint very much at the front of our minds.
It has been suggested that some of us may gather at the Jerusalem side
of the Wall to sing carols on Christmas Eve – hoping to be joined by
others on the Bethlehem side of the Wall, so that together we can at
least sing along. When you sing of Bethlehem in your services, or see
pictures of Bethlehem on your Christmas Cards, and perhaps on your TV
screens, reflect for a moment on the current state of the road to
Bethlehem.
Yet …
This week I have been to Tabeetha School in Jaffa twice for the
Christmas Presentations by the Primary School pupils.
There were a whole bunch of different thoughts :
a) how secular some of the presentations were, concentrating on Santa
Claus and presents etc. (no different from many presentations in
Scotland);
b) how little reference was made to the problem of getting to Bethlehem
– unlike a Christmas Presentation a couple of years ago by a group of
youngsters which had Mary and Joseph having to circumvent a checkpoint!;
c) how proud were the parents of their children taking part in the
presentations – with the Muslim mothers and fathers being there with
their cameras and taking as many pictures as any other parents;
d) how hard the teachers had worked to prepare the pupils for their
presentations – Christian and Jewish teachers working together.
Was it escapism? Of was it a glimpse of what is the “real” Reality – of
a human community united in celebrating a religious festival, rather
than divided into religious camps?
Yet …
Once again this week, being told by the Jewish friend of the young
Muslim boy from near Bethlehem, that he was going with him to the
hospital on Sunday, and would likely need some of the money I had
promised.
Yet …
Sharing in a service on 16th December for the new group of Ecumenical
Accompaniers under the Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine
and Israel (EAPPI) – (www.eappi.org) of the World Council of Churches,
who have just left their homes to come here and start their new
assignment – at a time when most people are trying to get to their
homes. The service ended with a veritable forest of small candles placed
around the large candle that had been the centrepiece of our Advent
Wreath last year – all having taken their light from the candle that
symbolised Christ, the Light of the World.
As you light your Christmas candles this year, it might be worth
remembering Bethlehem, and its difficulties. But it certainly is also
worth remembering the verse from the Prologue of the Gospel according to
John – “The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not
overcome it.” If the darkness did not overcome it then, if it has not
overcome it in the centuries since, we can be assured that it will not
overcome it in the future.
Thank you all for your greetings – by cards, by e-mails, by letters, by
phone calls.
We wish you all happiness at Christmas.
God bless
Joan and Clarence
Top
Circular Letter No 245 10th December 2005
4th December
The group from the Friends of St Andrew’s left Jerusalem early in the
morning en route to Hebron. On the outskirts of Jerusalem, the direct
road had been closed, and so we had to take a detour to get past the
point of closure. This was a bit of an inconvenience, and delayed our
arrival in Hebron by about 30 minutes. The closure was on what is known
as “The Tunnels” section of the road to Hebron, and had obviously been
in place for some time, given the amount of traffic that was being
diverted.
As we drove through the town of Halhul, and on in to Hebron, I was aware
of much more active Palestinian police presence than normal, and
wondered what was afoot.
In Hebron we had a chance once again to walk through the Old City and
also to stand on the roof of the building which houses the Christian
Peacemaker Team apartment and see the layout of the city. The Old City
lies at the bottom of a hollow, and does not cover a large area.
However, to get into it from any direction, one has to pass a
checkpoint. The effect of this on the commercial life of the area has
been dramatic, with many shops closed and few shoppers, and compared
with the bustling activity in other parts of Hebron, there is an air of
desolation and isolation.
Looking down on it from the roof of the CPT building, the presence of
Israeli army encampments is obvious. As are the buildings of Jewish
Settlements that have been constructed on the top of already existing
Palestinian buildings. Given the fact that it is almost impossible for
Palestinians to obtain building permits in much of, for instance,
Jerusalem, one wonders how the Settlers managed to get permits to
construct their buildings – unless of course they did not get permits
and their buildings are illegal. On the rim of the hills around the Old
City are the usual Israeli army outposts and observation points. We
walked down to the area of the Tomb of the Patriarchs – the tombs of
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. It is a place sacred to both Jew and Muslim,
and there are arrangements for one community to enter at one end of the
building and the other community to enter at the other end. Inside, they
both worship, but separately, and invoke the name of the same God. One
wonders what God thinks of it all.
To me, one of the most bizarre aspects of this part of the city, beside
the Tomb of the Patriarchs, was the existence on one side of the street
of a row of Palestinian shops, while facing them on the other side was a
new complex run by Jewish people, with a restaurant, and shops.
Hebron has had a bloody history, and it is hard to see any resolution of
the animosities that exist. In this way, it is a microcosm of the
situation in the country at large.
From Hebron we drove on to Idna where the group met the women of the
Co-operative, and then we went to the home of Naime for lunch. I do not
know how you would fare if 26 people were coming to lunch, but it seemed
as if it was an everyday occurrence for Naime and her family. We sat on
mattresses on the floor round the room, leaning against the walls, and
food was brought and set on the floor in front of us. Large plates of
rice and chicken were set down, followed by plates of stuffed vine
leaves, dishes of chopped tomato and cucumber salad, and bowls of thin
yogurt. It was delicious, and very much appreciated. We sat and enjoyed
the warmth of hospitality and friendship.
However, in Netanya it had been a different story earlier that morning,
when a young man had committed suicide killing 5 people at the same
time. From the wasteland of the Old City of Hebron, to the tranquillity
of Idna, and the violence of Netanya, it was clear to us which was
preferable. What was not at all clear was how to get everyone to the
situation where Idna would become the norm. Neither Hebron nor Netanya
seemed to offer any prospect of peace. At week’s end, the story of
violence continued – Israeli assassinations of those whom they accused
of being “militants”, and a Palestinian man fatally stabbing a soldier
at the checkpoint at Kalandia, between Jerusalem and Ramallah.
Politics is a strange business.
Haaretz Thursday December 8th P1. Main Headline: “Hanegbi bolts Likud
for Kadima” (Hanegbi is a Minister in the present Government of Mr.
Sharon. Likud is the party which Mr. Sharon has left to found his new
party, called Kadima.) ‘Minister Tzachi Hanegbi announced yesterday that
he was leaving the Likud and joining Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s new
party, Kadima, and he is expected to immediately participate in a Kadima
faction meeting today, alongside Sharon.’
So what, people might say.
Haaretz Thursday December 8th P2. Main Headline: “State Prosecutor
orders Hanegbi file expedited.” ‘State Prosecutor Eran Shendar
instructed his staff yesterday to deal with the Tzachi Hanegbi file “in
the shortest possible time.” Shendar’s order came after police submitted
the findings of their investigation of Hanegbi to the State Prosecutor
yesterday. The final decision on whether to indict Hanegbi in connection
with political appointments at the Environment Ministry will,
nevertheless, be made by Shendar and Attorney General Menachem Mazuz. As
first published in Haaretz on Monday, police investigators believe they
have found enough evidence to indict Hanegbi.’
It was only a few weeks ago that the US Secretary of State prolonged her
visit to Jerusalem to take part in negotiations to open the Rafah
crossing between Gaza and Egypt. There was much rhetoric about the
significance of the agreement, and the parallel agreement that there
should be regular convoys of buses and trucks between Gaza and the West
Bank. Last week, difficulties emerged about the supervision of the Rafah
Crossing, with the Israeli authorities being unhappy at the way in which
those whom it regarded as militants were able to enter Gaza. Haaretz
Friday December 2nd P3 “Rice envoy to check Rafah crossing”. … ‘Israel
complained this week of difficulties in obtaining information from the
Palestinians about the people crossing through the Rafah terminal.’
It was almost predictable to read the headline in Haaretz, Thursday
December 8th, P1 “Israel halts talks on bus convoys from Gaza to West
Bank.” ‘The security-political cabinet has decided to suspend talks with
the Palestinian Authority on operating bus convoys between the Gaza
Strip and the West Bank, despite an agreement made last month in talks
brokered by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. … A security
official yesterday linked the suspension of the convoy talks to a
disagreement over the supervision of the Rafah crossing on the
Gaza-Egypt border. Israel says the Palestinians are not allowing the
border to be monitored effectively, which enables hostile elements to
enter Gaza. Officials said that as long as Israel was unable to monitor
entry into the Gaza Strip, it cannot allow Palestinians to go through
Israel to get from Gaza to the West Bank.’ Even with Gaza totally sealed
off from Israel, there is still a desire by the Israeli authorities to
control exit and entry from Gaza to Egypt.
A story which has been on the front page of papers here for most of the
week reached a climax on Friday. Haaretz, December 9th P1 had the
headline “Red Cross finally opens door for MDA” [MDA are the initials of
the Israeli organisation Magen David Adom, which is the emergency
service within Israel that corresponds to the Red Cross and the Red
Crescent in other parts of the world.] ‘A new Red Cross emblem was
accepted yesterday at an international conference in Geneva, paving the
way for Israel to join the humanitarian organisation after nearly six
decades of exclusion. The 192 signatories of the Geneva convention
approved the new red crystal emblem in a vote after negotiations failed
to resolve an Israeli-Syrian dispute blocking the deal.’ As can be
expected, there are different reactions to this decision. From within
the Israeli Jewish community, the Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom
‘claimed the vote as a victory for Israeli diplomacy and a demonstration
of the “improvement in the international status of Israel.”’ From within
the Palestinian community, some see it as another example of the way in
which Israel has made the world change to accommodate it.
That well-known Security Threat is at it again. Helen Shehadeh’s permit
has expired and she has to apply for a new one. Please can I provide her
with a letter. And not only a letter for her, but also for someone on
the staff of the School. This will be necessary as it would be
impossible for her to pass through the new checkpoint procedures at the
Bethlehem checkpoint without someone to guide her. I hope to be able to
take a letter to her later today, and then we will just have to await
the outcome.
With Joan away visiting Vivienne for a few days, proof reading may not
be of the highest quality.
Stay well
God bless.
Joan and Clarence
Top
7 December 2005
Dear one and all,
or long-suffering friends
Joan left this afternoon to see Vivienne and her daughter, and perhaps
our son-in-law also, if he is able to get home before she leaves.
She asked me to send you a wee letter!
The latest from the producers of the calendar is that it should be ready
between December 15th and 17th.
Assuming that it is 17th, I will take a day's leave, and help Joan to
parcel and post calendars.
If we are able to get them away by 18th - despite the fact that it is a
Sunday, and I do not like going to the Post Office on a Sunday - they
should be in UK in 3 days, in USA in 4 days. Then it is up to local
arrangements to get them to you.
For some of the places in Scotland I will try to arrange a sort of
central person - Aberdeen, Edinburgh and that sort of thing.
But - so that I have some idea of what to order, knowing that for some
at least the time for orders has come and gone, could I ask you to
confirm your order.
That way, I will send only to those who still want them.
Sorry to impose this on you when you are all fairly busy.
But I know of no other way to get the information.
Please do not feel at all diffident in saying that you cannot use them,
given the fact that they are so late. We will make it known both to the
Gallery and to the Sponsors.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Clarence
Top
Circular Letter No 244 3rd December 2005
29th November.
The eve of St Andrew’s Day dawned bright, clear and sunny with the
temperature around C25 degrees. The party of Friends of St Andrew’s
which had arranged to come for the 75th Anniversary Service and
Reception for St Andrew’s Jerusalem had arrived safely the previous
evening. All the folk in it got into the bus for the trip of a lifetime
– their first exposure to the new security arrangements that the Israeli
government has put in place for those visiting Bethlehem.
The entrance was comparatively simple. The bus entered the new complex
and halted at an automatic barrier. The driver opened his window and
handed his ID card to a soldier sitting in an armoured check point
“office” The soldier had lowered the bullet-proof window in front of him
so that he could receive the ID. When it had been examined, the bus was
allowed to proceed. We drove through the narrow gate in the 8-metre high
concrete wall, and we were in Bethlehem. What could be easier!
On our return journey, some hours later, we stopped at the gate in the
concrete wall, and the bus driver was directed to an area where all his
passengers had to leave the bus. We stopped in front of a large yellow
notice board written in English – one of three, with the other two being
in Hebrew and Arabic. We were advised that we were entering a military
area, and give instructions on what to do. We first arrived at two
automatic turnstiles, about 2.5 metres high, with red and green lights
above them. When the green light came on, a person could pass through
the turnstile. That led to a space where there were two metal-detector
frames, of the sort normally used in security situations. Having passed
through them, we had to wait at the next set of turnstiles, again of the
2.5 metre high variety. Again having been shown a green light, we were
able to proceed, one at a time. We then walked down a long concrete
ramp, turned 180 degrees and continued down into the main inspection
area.
As we approached it there were toilets to one side – used by one member
of the group. I think there were without locks, but they did close
securely. There was a notice instructing people to keep the area clean.
We then had to line up in a crush barrier which allowed us to proceed
one at a time to the next 2.5 metre high turnstile, again with green and
red lights. For this first time since entering the complex, we were able
actually to see someone – a soldier sitting on the other side of the
turnstile, in a sort of “office” with what I took to be bullet-proof
glass windows. She could speak to us, and we could somehow be heard by
her. She activated the turnstile and all of our group except three
passed through. The visit to the toilet had delayed them, and so a
couple of young Palestinian women had got into the group. The voice from
the office issued instructions and they were made to wait while the
other three people rejoined the group. Through this turnstile one came
to an area where baggage could be checked in an x-ray machine – only one
that I saw. Then on to a final document checking turnstile – a more
friendly one just about waist height. We showed the outside of our
passports to a soldier inside his “office” and he allowed us to pass. We
had been allowed to leave Bethlehem and were now able to go to the bus
and continue our journey.
For us, it took about 10 minutes, as there were no other people in front
of us. What it would be like if two buses arrived at the same time, and
if there were some Palestinian people also crossing – it does not bear
thinking about.
For the Palestinians, there would have been more document checking, I
understand that names and ID numbers are recorded, I did notice
‘examination rooms’ where searches may be carried out. I do not know how
long it did take the young women to pass through.
We were passengers on a bus. I do not know what would happen if I
arrived at the checkpoint in my car with some passengers – whether they
would have to go through the whole process, or if there would be a way
in which they would be allowed to continue without having to leave the
car. We shall find out ere long.
November 30th.
A headline in Haaretz 30th November, P3. “PA police fire on undercover
IDF unit in Bethlehem.” ‘Palestinian policemen opened fire at undercover
IDF soldiers during an operation in Bethlehem yesterday. … According to
the (Israeli) army’s initial inquiry, the Palestinian police had not
been informed about the army operation. Thus, when the soldiers, who
were disguised to look like Arabs, came in to arrest a wanted man not
far from City Hall, the policemen took them for members of an armed
Palestinian gang. They opened fire almost immediately after the soldiers
got out of their car. In response, the soldiers fired warning shots into
the air until an IDF back-up force that was waiting nearby rushed to the
scene and rescued them.’
Obviously some people do not have to go through the checkpoint! It is
also an illustration of the way in which the armed forces of Israel
regard it as their right to operate anywhere in the West Bank. One
shudders to think what would have happened if one of the Israelis had
been killed in such an operation.
Is it any wonder that some people are now advising tour groups to go to
look-out posts within Israel and “inspect” Bethlehem through binoculars.
One wonders how long it will be before there is a replica Crypt
somewhere in Israel which will be visited by those who do not want to
undergo all this procedure for entering and leaving Bethlehem.
Friday December 2nd
The Inscription on the front of the Chalice reads : “To the Glory of
God, for use in Titwood Parish Church [Glasgow], this cup is dedicated
by the Reverend W H Rankine (first Minister of the Parish) and by Mrs.
Rankine, in humble gratitude to God for the first Communion of Ara,
their eldest daughter. 16th April 1905.”
The Inscription on the rear of the Chalice reads : “A Gift from Titwood
Church, Glasgow to St Andrew’s Church, Jerusalem, 1934.”
I had taken the single Chalice from the safe in St Andrew’s Church so
that I could use it for a Communion Service with the group currently
visiting us from the Society of the Friends of St Andrew’s. So, it was
used in a service at one of the special worship places situated around
the Church of the Beatitudes, overlooking the Sea of Galilee.
Later, in the bus, I read out the inscriptions to those sitting near me.
One of the other members of the group, at the rear of the bus, heard the
name ‘Rankine’ and asked me afterwards about it. Her name was Rankine.
The story unfolded as follows.
Elizabeth (the member of the group) was married to W H Rankine, whose
father was Adam Rankine, who was the son of the Rev W H Rankine. Her
father, W H Rankine, had been born to Adam Rankine and his wife in what
was then Palestine in the early 1920’s. He had in fact gone to school at
the Church of Scotland School, Tabeetha, in Jaffa, which we had visited
the day before.
Ara Rankine, who first communion was commemorated by the donation of the
Chalice, later became a Medical Doctor with the Church of Scotland
working in Poona in India for 40 years.
It was at that hospital, some years after Ara had retired, that another
member of the group had done her medical elective studies while training
to be a doctor.
It is a small world.
Saturday 3rd December.
Our return journey from Tiberias to Jerusalem had been planned so that
we could travel to Jayyous, where we were to meet with some
representatives of the village, and also have lunch. The visit would
give to the members of the group an opportunity to hear about, and see,
the effects of the Barrier/Fence on the lives of the people of Jayyous.
We travelled down through Israel, on the new Route 6, at one stage
passing by Tulkarm. Tulkarm is completely surrounded by the
Wall/Fence/Barrier, with the only entrance/exit being controlled by the
Israeli army. However, for the benefit of those travelling on Route 6,
the 8-metre high wall is camouflaged by landscaping, so that all that
motorists see is the upper 2 metres of the Wall. They can pass by,
totally and blissfully unaware of the fact that those living in Tulkarm
have no such landscaping to make the Wall seem more benign – they have
to live with the reality of its sold concrete face rising 8 metres above
them.
We passed through the checkpoint at Qalqilya with no difficulty, and
spent a couple of hours in Jayyous. From there we travelled on through
the West Bank to Jericho – passing another major new checkpoint under
construction at Tappuah Junction. I have referred to this before – a
checkpoint 20 kms on the Eastern (Palestinian) side of the Green Line,
and half way between the Green Line and the Jordan Valley.
In Jericho, there were more tourists there than I had seen for some
considerable time, and this corroborated the statements from travel
agents and people in the Tourist Industry, that more visitors are
coming.
Coming back up the hill from Jericho, we passed all the signs of Israeli
colonisation – the Settlement of Mizpe Jeriho, the road works to expand
the road from a two lane road to a four lane road, the settlements
around Ma’ale Adumim, and finally the checkpoint into Jerusalem itself.
It is a beautiful land, there are people of great integrity in both
major communities, and yet it is hard to escape the feeling of gathering
doom as one sees the Wall around such places as Jerusalem, inexorably
dividing the two peoples, and also cutting parts of East Jerusalem off
from other parts where there are schools hospitals, shops, and all the
components for “normal” life. This is being done on land that is not
recognised internationally as being part of Israel, but yet it is
happening, and the feeling of the Palestinians is that no-one cares, and
no-one is doing anything to halt the Israeli steam-roller.
Stay well.
God bless
Joan and Clarence
Top
November 27, 2005
Please forgive me for imposing on you again this week.
I have just no other way to get this information to those few folk who
might want it, than to send it to you all! Sorry.
If it excites you to think about coming, then feel welcome to get in
touch.
Clarence.
There are times when I can get organised to do things at the drop of a
hat. There are other times when I need to be dragged kicking and
screaming to get anything done.
This business of the Holy Week tour, for some reason, has been a sort of
blockage about taking time to sit down and do the homework. Sorry for
that to those who have been waiting, who have written etc.
I have tried to be as accurate as possible in the Table below. There may
be some things that are not there – if so, and you have questions,
please get back to me asap, and I promise that Joan will reply!
Costs for Tour, based on up to 20 people.
|
|
Item |
Single |
Double |
|
1. |
Accommodation : Single |
$574 |
|
|
2. |
Accommodation : Sharing room |
|
$350 |
|
3 |
Transport : 5 days @ $15 per person per day |
$75 |
$75 |
|
|
Driver costs : Accommodation and tip : approx |
$25 |
$25 |
|
4 |
Entrances to Sites : maximum |
$10 |
$10 |
|
5 |
Evening Meals : 6 evenings @ $25 maximum |
$150 |
$150 |
|
6. |
Lunches : 9 lunches @ $10 average |
$90 |
$90 |
|
|
Tips, shopping, drinks etc not included |
|
|
|
|
Listed Expenditure in Holy Land |
$924 |
$670 |
|
|
I have not added costs of travel to Jerusalem from
the airport, as this would depend on numbers coming on a flight
etc. Perhaps another $10 = $15 per person. |
|
|
In
Tiberias, a child sharing a room with parents would add another $25 per
night, and I think it would be much the same in Jerusalem.
Quotation is in dollars – for the simple fact that almost all prices for
tourists here are quoted in US$.
Suggested itinerary is :
Saturday 8th April Arrive early morning. This will depend on flights
etc. Sleep until lunch time.
Afternoon : Orientation to Jerusalem etc.
Sunday 9th April Morning : Worship in St Andrew’s
Afternoon : Walk to the Mount of Olives, join the procession down the
Mount and into the Old City. Back to St Andrew’s.
Monday 10th April Leave for Galilee, via the West Bank. See something of
the Wall/Fence
Evening at Tiberias.
Tuesday 11th April “Holy Places” – Capernaum; Feeding of 5,000; Peter’s
Primacy (Story at the end of John’s Gospel); Mount of Beatitudes.
Evening at Tiberias
Wednesday 12th April Nazareth – Church of the Annunciation; Nazareth
Village, possible visit to EMMS Hospital; Mount Tabor – Mount of
Transfiguration, and local church contact
Thursday 13th April Return to Jerusalem
Evening : Attend the Service of Footwashing in St George’s Episcopal
Cathedral, followed by walk to Gethsemane area. Back to St Andrew’s via
Kidron Valley and St Peter in Gallicantu Church.
Friday 14th April 0600 hours : Pilgrimage on the Via Dolorosa with the
Episcopal and Lutheran Churches.
Visits to other churches as possible for Good Friday services.
1500 hours : Walk from St Andrew’s Church to Cenacle, St Peter in
Gallicantu, and back to St Andrew’s
1700 hours. Service of Meditation in St Andrew’s
Saturday 15th April Free. Possible visit to Bethlehem.
Sunday 16th April Sunrise Service at St Andrew’s
1000 hours : Easter Communion : St Andrew’s
Free time. Programme can be arranged to meet needs of participants
People leave for UK according to their flights. Bookings anticipate that
people would leave some time on Monday.
Top
Circular Letter No 243 28th November 2005
The fragility of the relationships in the world in which we live is well
illustrated in the news reports today from Pakistan where churches have
been destroyed by groups of Muslim people reacting against what they
were told were desecrations of the Koran. Holy books for different
religions, holy places for worship, holy God, - what an emotive word is
“holy”, and what destruction it can bring about.
Yesterday in our service, I recounted 3 “minor” miracles which had
occurred for me in the previous 24 hours.
The first was on Saturday, we took Colin and Carol Morton, - Colin being
one of my predecessors as Minister here in Jerusalem, and Carol being
the person who started off what has become Sunbula here in Jerusalem,
and then started what is Hadeel in Edinburgh (shops which sell of
Palestinian Handcrafts) – to Idna, where there is one of the
cooperatives supported by Sunbula. Having completed the business
transactions, we then went to the home of one of the women who had
invited us for lunch. She and her family met us, and her father greeted
me like a long-lost brother. There is little verbal communication, but
he showed a real sense of friendship and complained that it had been two
months since we had last met! We had a delicious meal, after which we
were joined by two of his sons and another of his daughters, and our
host sat and enjoyed the event.
As I drive into the village, I always make a point of waving to as many
people as possible. I also always were my clerical collar. I go quite
openly as a Christian, and as a friend. I have never felt anything other
than welcome – yet I am also realistic enough to know that some spark
could ignite feelings that might prove difficult to control.
Nevertheless – we go, and we go in trust.
The second was on Sunday morning prior to our service. At the Guest
House I met a friend who comes from time to time to do some work in the
garden. She is Jewish. We greeted each other and then had a chat – about
work, about “the situation”, about her new grandchild – just normal
things. We were just two ordinary people doing ordinary things – but
underneath there is the recognition that for many in this part of the
world, such ordinary contact is impossible, separated as they are by
walls, be they physical, political, religious or whatever.
The third was during the course of the Service itself. Our preacher was
Denis Carlin, a Latin Catholic priest from Paisley. He has been here for
some months on a Sabbatical course at Tantur Ecumenical Institute, and
has come to worship with us on occasion. What could have been more
natural than to invite him to preach prior to his going back to
Scotland. And yet, when I growing up in Northern Ireland, viewed from
either the Protestant or the Catholic communities, the “other side” was
hardly recognised as Christian. He was speaking of Advent – the time of
preparation to the birth of Christ. One telling illustration that he
used was how we measure the time left to Christmas. Not in how many days
for prayer and spiritual preparation, but in how many shopping days
there are. He reminded us of the song “Ubi caritas, et amor, Deus ibi
est.” – “Where there is love, there is God.”
For me, it said something about the 3 events – with the Muslim family,
the Jewish woman, and the Catholic priest. God was there in all of them.
Work has not taken me to Bethlehem this week, but there have been tales
from other travellers who have been there – tales of the new “terminal”,
“border crossing”, “check point” – it has many names and many guises.
One most poignant comment on it came this week from a pastor in
Bethlehem. He spoke of Psalm 24. It starts with the affirmation that
“The earth is the Lord’s, and all who live in it.” Amen. Then he went on
to quote the verses about gates. “Lift up your heads, O Gates, that the
King of Glory may come in.” He spoke of the gates which have come down
around Bethlehem, of the different vision of those who are “kings” now
over the approach and entry to Bethlehem, and of the way in which the
King of Glory would have a hard time getting to the city now. In the
Church of Scotland, there is a marvellous tune called St George’s
Edinburgh, which is used as one of the tunes when singing the metrical
version of this Psalm. Perhaps those of you who know the tune and the
Psalm will give a moment’s thought to the very different gates that now
straddle the road from Jerusalem to Bethlehem.
A phenomenon which I am hearing more about is that of the tourists who
are taken by their tour guides to the Israeli Settlement of Har Homa,
from which one can look across to Bethlehem. The bus stops at a sort of
view-point, and binoculars are shared as people look across at
Bethlehem. For some, it is regarded as too dangerous to go there Perhaps
the new Check Point contributes to that sense of danger and insecurity.
Travelling around on the West Bank, one is aware of the fact that there
are not all that many Palestinian cars on the main roads. This is a
visual demonstration of the effect of what has been called “the
apartheid road system”, which is an attempt to describe the fact that
while there are main roads, most of good quality, they are largely
reserved for Jewish people, with Palestinians having to travel on
secondary roads, if they exist, or make roads over the hills. This was
so very clear to us on Saturday last, when we went to Idna. For the last
10 kms of the journey, on Route 35, which runs from the Green Line
towards Hebron, we saw 1 Palestinian car actually moving, and 2 others
that had been stopped by an Israeli police patrol. Talking about this
with the people in Idna, they said that for years they had not been on
the main road. They leave their village, cross the main road on to a
secondary road to an adjoining village, and then take an even smaller
road to Hebron. When we went with a member of the Christian Peacemaker
Team to visit A Towani village, south of Hebron, she was unable to
direct us along the “main” roads, as she has always travelled in
Palestinian taxis over the hills. She literally did not know the main
road!
The election of a person to the office of Patriarch of the Greek
Orthodox Church is carried out by members of what is called The
Brotherhood – priests within the Patriarchate of Jerusalem. However, a
Patriarch also requires confirmation by three outside bodies – the State
of Israel, the State of Jordan, and the Palestinian Authority. Not long
after we arrived here, there was an election of a new Patriarch –
Ireneos. It is alleged that during his time as Patriarch, property just
inside the Jaffa Gate belonging to the Greek Orthodox Church was
leased/transferred to Jewish people. There was a huge outcry, as a
result of which Ireneos was deposed by the Church. A new election was
held, and Theophilos was elected Patriarch. The deposing of Ireneos and
the election of Theophilos were both recognised by Jordan and the
Palestinian Authority. However, for reasons which I imagine are fairly
clear, the Israeli Government refused to recognise the removal of
Ireneos, and so have also refused to recognise the election of
Theophilos. This week saw the Enthronement of Theophilos – and also a
war of words between the Patriarchate and the Israeli government. One of
the problems surrounding the issue is that the Greek Orthodox Church,
like every other institution, has to operate within the legal and
financial framework of the laws of Israel. Its financial operations have
been severely limited as a result of this “confrontation”, and it is
difficult to survive without being able to pay one’s bills. It will be
some time, I am sure, before it will all be resolved, particularly as we
are now coming into a period of political uncertainty in Israel, with
elections due in a few months.
One of the events of the past week that may have a great deal of
symbolism has been the opening of the Rafah Crossing from Gaza into
Egypt. Since 1967, every official exit from the West Bank towards
Israel, or Jordan, or Egypt, has been controlled by Israeli forces. When
people on duty are benign, there may have been few problems. When they
are agitated, feeling endangered, or just plain awkward, then life has
been extremely difficult for Palestinians trying to leave the West Bank
or Gaza. Now, for some, there is an alternative – a route into Egypt. I
remember speaking to people in Gaza about the obstacles they had to face
in travelling outside Gaza – the possibility the Israeli army imposing
road closures within Gaza; the possibility of the Rafah crossing being
closed; just the sheer uncertainty of when they might arrive at their
destination, regardless of when they set out from home. Then again, when
would they be able to get home, having been outside Gaza. Hopefully,
things will be easier, but one never knows.
St Andrew’s Day is fast approaching. For those who need reminded of the
date, it is November 30th. It was on St Andrew’s Day 1930 that the
Church and Hospice of St Andrew’s in Jerusalem was consecrated. So, we
will be celebrating 75 years of work and witness this coming week. A
group of people from The Friends of St Andrew’s is due to arrive this
evening for a visit of a week. It will be good to welcome them, and to
have them here to share in the Celebrations. At 1700 hours on Wednesday,
we will have our Service of Thanksgiving, and at 1800 hours, we will
have our Reception.
In Edinburgh, there will be a Service about the same time as we are
having our Service here – I am sure we will say a prayer for each other.
Why not join us, wherever you happen to be?
Stay well.
God bless
Joan and Clarence
Top
Circular Letter No 242 November 2005
First of all, welcome. There was no letter last week, as I was pretty
fully occupied with the visit of the Moderator of the General Assembly
of the Church of Scotland to Israel and Palestine.
Secondly, during the week I received an e-mail relating to a review by a
panel appointed by the Governors of the BBC of the coverage of the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict by the BBC.
If you have felt over the years, or over the weeks, that there has been
some aspect of the coverage of events here offered by the BBC which has
troubled you, now is the time to get in touch with the panel.
Unfortunately, I understand that the date by which submissions have to
be lodged is close – 25th November.
Saturday November 12th
For me, it is one of the most moving experiences of the year here in
Jerusalem – the annual Service of Remembrance at Mount Scopus
Commonwealth War Graves Commission Cemetery. One of the things that
makes it so moving was exemplified this morning when, in the laying of
Wreaths the Australian representative was immediately followed by the
Turkish Representative. Earlier in the year there had been the ANZAC Day
service at the same place, recalling the fearsome conflict between ANZAC
and Turkish forces at Gallipoli in 1915. Maybe there is room for some
hope for the relationships between Jewish person and Arab person, when
the conflict between Israel and Palestine is resolved.
Tuesday November 15th.
An early start got me to Tabeetha in Jaffa for a School Assembly with
the Upper Primary classes.
Back at Beit Jala, I attended part of a meeting of the leaders of the
Ecumenical Accompaniment Programme in Palestine and Israel. (EAPPI). At
the meeting, one of the EAPPI people announced that the new Checkpoint
buildings between Jerusalem and Bethlehem had been brought into
operation. Now, like other places, pedestrians have to go through all
sorts of turnstiles and gates. More on this later, when I have had a
chance to experience it for myself.
Wednesday November 16th
There is a saying in English about Justice not only being done, but
being seen to be done.
The thought came to mind when reading the paper this morning.
Haaretz Wednesday 16th November P1. “PM’s son convicted of election
campaign violations.” ‘Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s son Omri, a Likud
Member of the Knesset, is apparently planning to use new campaign
finance regulations in an attempt to minimize his sentence for charges
relating to the funding of his father’s 1999 primaries (for leadership
of the Likud party) campaign.’ Omri Sharon raised NIS 6 million for the
campaign of his father, though at the time the legal limit for such a
campaign was NIS 800,000. However, there are changes to the regulations
before the Knesset which would raise the limit to NIS 3 million. Should
this be accepted, it would mean that when sentencing takes place (it has
been postponed for two to three months to allow Defence attorneys
prepare their submission) the new limit could be in place. …’The penal
code allows a court to let off a defendant if at the time of sentencing,
the offence is no longer considered a crime. This is true even if the
defendant has pleaded guilty.’ Justice being seen to be done, and while
this is happening the Prime Minister continues to maintain that he was
not involved in this aspect of his election campaign.
Haaretz Wednesday 16th November P1.
“IDF captain acquitted of ‘confirming kill’ of 13 year-old Palestinian
girl in Gaza.” The story relates to an event in Rafah when a school girl
was killed by Israeli army soldiers. ‘The incident received widespread
media attention after Captain R was suspected of ‘”confirming the kill”
and shooting the girl multiple times after she had already been hit by
IDF gunfire and was lying on the ground. … In their acquittal yesterday
the judges at the Southern Command’s military court harshly criticised
the manner in which the investigation was conducted by the Military
Police, as well as the media’s coverage of the affair, … Attorney Leah
Tsemel, who represented the family of the girl, said she wasn’t surprise
by the court’s ruling. “It has been proved once again that the blood of
a Palestinian, even if she was young and small, doesn’t count for much,”
she said.’
Haaretz Wednesday 16th November P3.
“Supreme Court releases man accused of assault on Gaza teen.” ‘The
Supreme Court accepted an appeal yesterday calling for the release from
prison of Shimshon Sitrin, who allegedly led the attempted lynching of
Palestinian teen Hilal Majaida in Gaza in June. Majaida was attacked by
a gang of settler youths prior to Israel’s pullout from the Gaza Strip.
Israel Defence Forces soldiers came to Majaida’ s rescue, but he was
nevertheless wounded and hospitalized in Khan Younis. … Judge Edmund
Levi decided to release Sitrin to house arrest – with restrictions on
his movements – after concluding that Sitrin understood the error of his
ways. … “As the youth (Majaida) lay wounded, the defendant (Sitrin)
walked by, saw him and the kneeling soldier who was trying to protect
him, and decided to hurt the youth. He picked up a stone, jumped on a
wall and threw the stone strongly at the youth’s head in order to kill
him,” stated the indictment against (Sitrin) him.’
The question that comes to my mind is would the same decision have been
taken had it been a Palestinian accused of throwing a stone at the head
of a Jewish youth.
Friday 18th November.
The sky was mostly clear, the air felt crisp, the leaves that remained
on the vines on the hillsides as we drove south past Bethlehem were a
mixture of yellowy green, golden and crimson. It should have been an
opportunity to be thankful for being in such a beautiful part of the
world. Sadly, it was not.
The southern entrance to Bethlehem from the direction of Hebron has been
blocked now for over 4 years. That has not meant that nothing has been
happening there. A new road has been driven into the hills, a road to
the northern end of the Settlement of Efrat. So, for one group of people
who live there, on other people’s lands, there is a new road. For
another group of people living there, there is a continued blockade.
What made it worse this morning was seeing a group of “caravans”
installed on the hillside above that road junction. This is the classic
way in which a Settlement is commenced. A hill top is taken over,
temporary homes are put on it, people move in, and they are provided
with water, electricity, road access, and protection by the Israeli
army. For the people around Bethlehem, withdrawal from Gaza has only
meant increased confiscation of their lands.
Further down the road, at what had been a fairly small road junction a
few years ago but now boasts a huge roundabout and the end of a 4-land
divided highway, there was a checkpoint. As I cannot stress enough, for
us such a checkpoint is a relatively minor irritation. For the
Palestinian driver of a car just in front of us, and h |