|
Other Letters:
No 25-30
No 31-36
No
37-41
No
42-48
No 49-60
No 61-69
No 70-79
No 80-89
No 90-100
No 101-109
No 110-119
No 120-129
No 130-139
No 140-149
No 150-159
No 160-169
No 170-179
No 180-189
No 190-199
No 200-209
No 210-219
No 220-229
No 230-239
No 240-249
No 250-259
No 260-270
Partnership
in Conflict
|
Circular Letter No 119
22nd March 2003
Sunday March 16th. While the rest of the world busies itself with a
potential war, the headline today is "No 'independent' Palestinian
state." This is the response of the Government of Israel to what is
euphemistically called "the Road Map", and which is being conveniently
wheeled out in a time of crisis by governments in the West seeking to
gain some sort of political support. 'All mention of an independent
Palestinian state has been eliminated in Israel's response to the Road
Map prepared by the US, the European Union, the UN and Russia. An
"independent" Palestinian state, which would be initially established
along temporary borders, is replaced with "certain attributes of
sovereignty" and any such state is required to be "credible" and
"law-abiding" …Israel also rejects the demand of immediate removal of
all illegal outposts set up in the territories during the government
of Ariel Sharon. … Israel rejects the notion that the freeze on
settlement activity will also include the natural growth of
settlements. … The Israeli document says the future of the settlements
will be determined only by a final agreement and therefore Israel is
only willing to grant territorial continuity to the Palestinians only
"where this is possible."
Admittedly this is a bargaining paper, and one would not expect the
Government of Israel to give away all its bargaining positions before
the negotiations have even started. However, anyone taking a drive on
the West Bank can see the extent to which the illegal settlements are
spreading like a cancer across the hills of Judea and Samaria, and
with each caravan that is placed on a hill top, the eventual
separation of the two people becomes more difficult.
It is good to have this paper on the table. At least it will let
people judge about the charges of hypocrisy that are flying round
concerning the zeal of the US and the UK to enforce compliance with UN
Resolutions on Iraq, while colluding in the breach of UN Resolutions
by Israel.
The fear of the Palestinians, that with the attention of the world on
Iraq, the Israeli army will feel that it has a free hand to do what it
wishes, certainly seems to be borne out by the inside pages of the
paper. Six Palestinians were killed in a clash in the Jenin refugee
camp early on Friday morning. "We broke into a house containing four
wanted men, who were armed" said Brigadier-General Gershon Yitzhak,.
"The soldiers beat them to the punch and shot them. An armed guard on
the roof was also shot. In all, five terrorists were killed. A sixth
person was shot and killed while trying to flee. More than four
weapons were seized during the operation, as well as IDF uniforms and
badges." Necessary force? Excessive force? And this is the Army report
on the incident.
We had planned to have some soup and rolls after church on Sunday
morning. Elias, the cook who lives in Bethlehem, and who was given a
permit to come to work at the Hospice, agreed to come and do the
cooking for us. 0930 hours he phoned from his home - he had gone to
the checkpoint and had been refused permission to cross - despite
having valid permits.
Helen Shehadeh did manage to get in to the service - but it took her a
long time, and she spoke of the "tightness" of the closure. It is
better not to ask too many questions as to how a blind person manages
to pass through the Closure.
It is the time of the Purim Festival, when Jewish people recall the
events recalled in the Book of Esther in the Bible. There is a lot of
dressing up, parties, and generally fun. On our way to the Post Office
after church, we passed some youngsters on their way home from school,
with their costumes. One of them was dressed in a light brown tunic,
carrying a Cross, and a Crown of Thorns. When I spoke with one Jewish
person about this, he said that it was meant in fun, and should not be
taken seriously. Can one imagine the outcry that there would be if a
"fun" costume appeared during a Christian festival, denigrating one of
the most sacred symbols of the Jewish faith?
Monday 17th March. Front Page : "American activist killed by army
bulldozer in Rafah (Gaza Strip)." Israeli officials expressed "regret"
over the incident to American officials, sources in Jerusalem said,
and in Washington a State Department statement said it had received
reports of the incident and was "assessing the situation".
Page 2 : 3 Palestinians killed by IDF. 'Two Palestinians were killed
in Gaza and one in the West Bank yesterday as the IDF enforced a
closure, preventing any Palestinians from entering Israel during the
Purim holiday.' Given the fact that it is almost impossible for people
to get out of Gaza, it is perhaps a little disingenuous to say that
two people were killed in Gaza as part of the Closure for Purim. In
all instances, it turns out that there was nothing to do with
attempting to get into Israel at all.
With most of you, we have watched today the events and announcements
about the coming War. I think the hardest to take is the way in which
speaker after speaker justifies the action against Iraq on the grounds
that Saddam Hussein has not implemented UN resolutions.
There has been contact with the Church of Scotland in Edinburgh, about
our personal safety and the question of evacuation. I know of no
Church minister leaving Jerusalem at present. The Church of Scotland
has accepted the wish of its staff here to stay and demonstrate
solidarity with the communities of people here - all people,
regardless of race or religion. It has also made provision for staff
to be accommodated on Cyprus should anyone decide to leave. We are
grateful for this concern, and for the provisions made for us. We are
also grateful for the recognition of our feeling that this is where we
should be at this particular time.
{It is interesting to note the change in TV coverage of the Middle
East in the past few days. We are now being subjected to reports from
this aircraft carrier and from that army unit, showing forces getting
ready for war. I personally find it obscene, making it all look like a
hyped up version of Eastenders or some other TV soap programme. }
Tuesday 18th March. With the eyes of the world elsewhere, the headline
makes grim reading this morning. We are told by the Army to stock up
on 'sealed room gear'. Below that is the almost incidental headline
'13 Palestinians killed, including toddler, two teens.'
From time to time, a letter or a donation will arrive that is for
someone in Bethlehem. One of the reasons for posting it to St Andrew's
is the lack of certainty that a letter will actually get through to
Bethlehem. One such letter arrived for Helen Shehadeh, and so, to pay
a visit before the war started, I went off to do some pastoral
visiting. This time the wait at the check point was 30 minutes. As I
drove through in mid-afternoon, I saw a group of Palestinian men
standing at one side of the road, obviously waiting for their
documents to be returned to them so that they could go home.
Helen was well - at home making a few extra preparations, as she did
not know what might happen if and when the war started. There was
already Closure, so that people were not able to get to Jerusalem,
even if they had the correct documents. Would there also be curfew?
She felt it was wise to be prepared. We had a chat, about her coming
to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland in Edinburgh this
year. We talked about the School. In Israel, the emphasis is on what
preparations need to be made to ensure safety and health. Youngsters
here have gas masks. The youngsters in her school have not. I asked
about water supplies, in case the regular supply became contaminated.
Her reply was to ask how she could get in sufficient water for 24
children, and the staff who would be there to care for them - for
washing, cooking, drinking etc. There was just no answer. I did not
have the hundreds, or even thousands, of shekels that would be
required to provide an adequate supply of drinking water.
A couple of hours later as I was going home, again having to wait for
about 20 minutes at the check point, I saw the group of men still
there, still waiting for their documents. It was cold, and the one
concession that the Israeli Army had made to them was to allow them to
move to the other side of the road into some shelter from the wind.
As the week progressed we were given instructions in the press and on
the TV and radio as to what we should be doing - Wednesday, getting a
sealed room ready; Thursday, carrying gas masks. Driving around on
Thursday, less than 10% of the people whom I saw were carrying gas
masks. On Friday, it was an even smaller percentage. Although the
Ministry of Education had said that schools should be open on Thursday
and Friday, reports were that quite a large percentage of parents had
kept their children at home. Tabeetha School, of the Church of
Scotland closed for a couple of days, as although it has a bomb
shelter, it will only accommodate about 50% of the children. To have
made preparations to seal a room, or a hall, for the other 50% would
have been difficult. So, it was felt the wise course of action was to
close for a short period.
On Thursday morning, I attended the monthly "Men in Ministry" Prayer
Breakfast. This is a group of theologically right-wing men who
minister in the Jerusalem area. They largely see their ministry as
being to the Jewish community. By and large there is little contact
between them and the other "historic" Christian churches, and not a
lot of contact with the Palestinian Christian community. The minister
of the Church of Scotland is part of this group, ex officio, rather
than because he necessarily identifies with their theology or their
ministry. It was noticeable that, despite all the notices from
Embassies and Consulates, and perhaps also from churches, that there
were some 60 people there that morning, all of whom felt that this was
the place for them to be at this time. In one of the prayers, the
person leading the group prayed for "all those who would go to
eternity today." I assume that he meant those who would be killed in
the war in Iraq!
The eyes of the world are directed at Iraq, and the crimes that Saddam
Hussein perpetrated on his own people - even using chemicals against
them. There is an article in the Weekend Ha'aretz this Friday (21st
March) about the action of the Israel Lands Administration in pursuing
its dispute with a Bedouin community in part of the Negev Hills. "On
March 4, in the early morning hours, two crop-dusting places flew over
the Negev Hills, spraying field crops with a toxin that cause them to
wither and die. Ten people, most of them children, inhaled the
substance and required medical treatment. The farmers, whose crops
were sprayed are Bedouin who have been living in the region for
generations. …. These farmers are Israeli citizens, who have been
living in recognized villages since the establishment of the state."
Could this possibly be chemical warfare against its own citizens?
The TV news channels are giving us almost non-stop War coverage. Any
time we turn on the news, we get more about the war - and there is not
all that much real news. Pundits are interviewed in the safety of the
studios; pictures show us Baghdad being bombed, and the commentators
talk about it as if they were watching a Carnival Parade - here comes
another plane etc. BBC World gives us the war - BBC Prime gives us
Ready Steady Cook and The Weakest Link! And there is not all that much
difference in the tone of many of the participants.
We are well. We think we will go to Ein Gedi, at the Dead Sea, for a
walk, It has been cold and wet here for a couple of days - might find
some heat there. May you stay well.
God bless. Joan and Clarence.
top
Circular Letter No 118
15th March 2003
Saturday 8th March. We went on a "Walk" to Ramat Hanadiv, just inland
one or two kilometres from Caesarea. It was led by Father Jerry
Murphy-O'Connor who has lived here for some 30 years, and is an
acknowledged expert on the history of the Holy Land. The particular
sites that we visited on this excursion were a farm that dates back to
the 1st century AD, and a sort of Manor House of a wealthy family,
dating from much the same period. Standing on the hill, looking down
to the coast, and seeing the remaining signs of the works of the Roman
Empire - the ruins of Caesarea, the lines of the aqueducts that had
been built to bring it water, the ruins of these buildings which had
serviced the population of Caesarea, brought home the transient nature
of human governments and civilisations. What must have seemed
impregnable at the time of Christ was gone a few centuries later. It
is a salutary reminder of the frailty of what people are trying to
build today.
Sunday 9th March. 33 people attended the Morning Service, the largest
number for a long time, except for one Sunday when a group was staying
in the Guest House. We were a very mixed bunch - indigenous
Palestinian Christians, a couple of Jewish young people, expatriates
of many different theological positions, including a young man who has
come to Israel to live and to preach the Gospel to the people of
Israel.
Monday 10th March. We were all very glad when Elias ( a long-time
employee at St Andrew's ) found a job recently within Bethlehem, as we
hoped that this would give him and his family some security as well as
financial support. Sadly, it did not work out, and he is once again
looking for work. So, it is back to making marmalade, chutney, lasagna
and anything else that might sell. A quick trip into Bethlehem on
Monday enabled me to collect his latest production.
Before going on leave last year, it was not uncommon to sit for 30
minutes, and even longer, waiting to get through the Check Point. Now
the situation is quite different. It rarely takes more than 10 minutes
- but even that could be shorter if the soldiers were more efficient.
There is now almost no traffic at all between Jerusalem and Bethlehem,
such is the virtual total blockade that has been put on it, and the
almost complete ban on people from Bethlehem travelling into
Jerusalem.
Tuesday 11th March When Mr Sharon announced the members of his new
government a few weeks ago, there was wide-spread surprise at the
person whom he nominated to be the Minister of Public Security, Mr
Tzachi Hanegbi. This was because he has been the subject of police
investigations on a number of occasions, and as Minister of Public
Security, is responsible for the work of the Police. A Petition
against the appointment has been submitted by the Movement for Quality
Government in Israel, arguing that Mr Hanegbi is unfit to be the
Public Security Minister, as he has been investigated several times,
though never been indicted. Now the High Court of Justice has issued a
show-cause order requiring Mr Sharon to explain his refusal to rescind
Mr Hanegbi's appointment. (Tuesday 11th March Ha'aretz.).
In a sense, it is a sort of storm in a tea-cup, as Mr Hanegbi has held
other posts, including that of Justice Minister and Chairman of the
Judicial Appointments Committee, and no one ever challenged those
appointments. However, the article immediately below the one about Mr
Hanegbi is headed "Beit Hanina home demolished despite judge's order
to wait." It commences 'The Interior Ministry yesterday destroyed a
house belonging to a Palestinian family in the northeastern Jerusalem
suburb of Beit Hanina, despite a court order delaying the demolition.
The court was due to discuss the case next week. The head of the
ministry's supervision department in Jerusalem, Tzvi Schneider,
personally initiated and oversaw the demolition.
One of the great anxieties within the Palestinian community is what
might be done by the Israeli Government and Army when the attention of
the world is completely taken up by a war in Iraq. When even a Court
Order does not offer protection in Jerusalem, what will happen on the
West Bank, where there is even less likelihood of getting a court
order, and less chance of the world finding out about any breach of
such an order.
Thursday 13th March. "Have you got your gas mask?" Such is a routine
way in which many conversations open at present. Today's paper has, as
its lead story, "Thousands of child gas masks are faulty". "Thousands
of protective kits handed out in the Dan region in recent days for
babies and children have been revealed to have a severe technical
fault with their screw-in mechanisms. The screw-in connection between
the bellows and the pipe that provides air is critical and determines
the level of the protection provided by the masks. …… The Home Front
Commands operates distribution centres to hand out gas masks. Although
the Army had known about the problem of inconsistency in the screw-in
bellows for at least 6 months, it had failed to inform the Home Front
Command.
Beside this article is one headed : "18% of 1,945 Palestinians killed
in Intifada were innocent civilians, IDF says; 130 were children."
'The casualty figures, which are not published officially, are lower
than those compiled by Palestinian organisations and human rights
groups. …. Those killed include 365 (18%) who had nothing to do with
terrorist activity; 130 (7%) children under the age of 16, and 235
(11%) adults, many of whom were women and elderly people.'
Friday 14th March. One of the facts with which we all have to contend
is the management of news. Reading these letters, you are just as much
subjected to my view of the world as you are when you read any paper,
when you are provided with what the Editor feels is newsworthy. This
is said in relation to two stories that have come up in the past few
days.
One of the facts of life here is that the Israeli army on the West
Bank and Gaza has a virtual policy of shoot first and ask afterwards.
There are those who will say this is tantamount to murder. There are
others who will say that it is a perfectly justified approach, given
the situation in which it is operating. Be that as it may, today's
paper has the leading headline "IDF kills 2 Israelis in 'tragic
mistake'." 'Two Israeli security guards at an illegal outpost south of
Hebron were killed yesterday by an IDF combat unit that was lying in
wait for suspected Palestinian terrorists…..The source of the mistake
that led to the tragedy was the misidentification by the observer
force of the hill of the outpost as another nearby hill with buildings
on it where wanted men were presumed to be in hiding.'
Beside this story is an Analysis Column by Amos Harel, which commences
: 'Had yesterday's incident near the settlement of Pnai Hever ended
with the death of two Palestinians, the story would probably not have
merited more than a few lines in this morning's papers.'
This is one of the most frustrating aspects of living here - how to
get ordinary people (a) to hear the news and (b) to do something about
it. It would be even better if governments could be got to listen to
the news which is given to them.
On Page 2 of the same paper there is a report that 4 Palestinian
gunmen were killed by Israeli army troops in Tamun in the Northern
Jordan Valley. It is said that Palestinians opened fire against the
patrol and were killed in the ensuing fight. No Israeli soldiers where
wounded in the incident. This sort of report occurs regularly -
Palestinians open fire, they are killed, and no soldiers wounded. It
makes one wonder why the Palestinian gunmen are so inaccurate as to
miss their targets with monotonous regularity, which the Israeli
soldiers are so accurate as to be able to kill all their attackers
without suffering any injuries, let alone any fatalities. Or is it
perhaps some sort of manipulation of news, for which no independent
witnesses are available? Or am I being too Machiavellian?
One of the principal roads serving the illegal settlements that are
spreading south of Bethlehem is what is called the "tunnel road" -
because it passes through two tunnels which take it past Bethlehem and
Beit Jala. It is reserved for the use of Israeli traffic. Expatriates
like ourselves are also able to use it. On Thursday, this road was
closed to Israeli Arabs. There was a warning of a possible terrorist
attack from the Judea area, aided by Israeli Arabs. But on Thursday
they were not allowed to use the road. After some hours the
restriction was lifted. Thus someone like Rizek Abusharr, identified
as an Israeli Arab, born and brought up here, would have been denied
access to that road had he wished to travel on it. One of the Israeli
Arab MKs commented that "this move brings the racist political culture
to the level of official apartheid." Can you imagine what it would be
like if the police in Glasgow got some form of warning that there was
going to be an armed attack on a building in Glasgow, by people who
were black and who would be travelling from the Edinburgh area, and as
a result they went out and put road blocks at every entrance to the M8
motorway between Edinburgh and Glasgow. Cars would be stopped, and any
vehicle with a black person in it would not be allowed to continue its
journey. A black person on a bus would be taken off and turned back?
It sounds preposterous, yet that is what in effect was done for a few
hours on Thursday. Having done it once, what is to stop the Israeli
army from doing it again?
On that road, as you approach Jerusalem, there is a vehicle
checkpoint. (Vehicle, as there are no pedestrians allowed on that
road.) All cars have to slow down, and there is an initial visual
inspection by a soldier. In our case, the inspection notes that our
numberplate is white and so we are automatically separated into a
traffic lane where we can have our Passports checked. This usually
only take a few moments, and is routine. Occasionally, there are some
additional questions, and even more occasionally is the car given any
sort of search. If however, the soldier decides in his visual
inspection that you are an Arab, then the questions are rather more
lengthy, the inspection of documents takes longer, and it is rare in
my observation that the vehicle is allowed to proceed without some
form of inspection. When you pass this visual inspection by the
soldier, you drive straight past the inspection area, and continue on
your way with only a minor delay.
Cheerful news. (Surprise, surprise) Twice a month for the past while,
on Friday mornings, Joan and I have gone down to Idna, a village to
the west of Hebron, to visit the leaders of the Women's Co-operative
there. Toshiko, the Japanese woman who used to work at Sunbula, also
goes with us. She is working with them to develop their embroidery
design skills; they are responding to her by producing quite a few
suggestions for new products; and Joan and I spend an hour or so with
them, doing some "English teaching". We were amazed to find out
yesterday how many people in the village are said to have computers in
their homes (the women said 20% - perhaps an over optimistic
assessment). One of the women at the group meeting had one of her sons
with her - a smart young boy from Primary School. He was too polite to
try to find the place in the book for his mother, but it was clear
that he was well ahead of her in English! He also has a computer at
home - though it is broken!! There are also two Internet cafés. We
have asked to meet one of the Teachers from the local schools, to see
if we can help arrange some sort of teaching programme for the women,
and who knows, even some sort of computer lessons.
They had prepared lunch for us - sensibly they had not asked us if we
would be able to stay - they just presented us with a fait accompli,
and lunch was served! Rice and chicken. It gave us a chance to talk a
bit more with them. Three of the four are married and between them
have 27 children. The husband of one of them works as a labourer in
orange groves - obviously very temporary and seasonal work, but it is
good that he at least has work. He leaves at 0500 hours each day he is
working, and gets back about 1700 hours. For this, he earns NIS 120
per day - about ₤15. To coin a phrase, not a lot.
Happy St Patrick's day. Stay well. God bless.
Joan and Clarence
top
Circular Letter No 118a
16th March 2003
Sunday Evening Reflection.
I am writing this more for my own reflection than for any other
purpose. If you wish to read it, please do so. If you feel that one
letter a week is enough, and so this is more than enough, please feel
free to delete it!
This morning, the readings from the Bible according to the Lectionary
that we use, featured Abram, or Abraham as he become. They evoked the
question as to who, today, is a "descendant" of Abraham? Someone
according to genetics? Someone according to faith? Someone according
to "works" - what a person does? For me, the whole environment in
which I might have discussed such a question was in the past, was
radically questioned this week in chance conversation. It was outside
a house in Idna village, near Hebron. I was talking to a man whom I
had met the previous week while on his way to the Mosque. He is the
brother of a couple of the women in the Embroidery Co-operative. He
came back again this week, obviously looking for me, and wanting to
have a chat. He was a school teacher, and now is a school
administrator. We talked about Curriculum, and I asked if there was
any instruction about Judaism or Christianity. To illustrate his
answer he drew a little diagram with a stone on the concrete roof
beside which we were standing. It had one starting point, and two
lines moving out from it. The starting point was Abraham, and the two
lines were representing Isaac and Ishmael - the forerunners of Judaism
and Islam. The point he was making was that in teaching about Abraham,
there was reference to the prophets of Judaism and Christianity, and
that was sufficient for the pupils.
The brief conversation brought a new - and living - perspective to the
readings about Abraham. No longer were they purely academic, or even
theological, about distant matters, but about one which is exceedingly
relevant here. Just what does it mean to be descended from Abraham?
Once a month we have an Evening Service, following what we call "The
Taizé Tradition." We share it with the community from the Ecce Homo
convent, on the Via Dolorosa. This evening, as it was at Ecce Homo, I
walked down there through the Old City. I remember the excitement
which I felt the first time I walked along the Via Dolorosa, and the
life that there was. Streets were full, shopkeepers were busy, and
there was a bustle about the place. This evening, even allowing for
the fact that it was 1630 hours, it was almost deserted. Was it just
familiarity with the City that made it seem so ordinary? Was it
because it appears to have changed from being a cosmopolitan centre
where you could meet the world, to being the shopping centre for the
community of East Jerusalem? Whatever it is, it certainly lacks the
excitement of a few years ago. The one place where there was some sort
of "life" was at the Jaffa Gate. There were many Jewish people heading
for the Western Wall, on what is the approach to the holiday of Purim.
Armed police mounted a sort of road block, stopping some people - not
surprisingly those stopped were all Arabs. The police were watched by
the old men sitting along the side of the road - all of them Arab. One
wonders what was in their minds, and in the minds of the police.
The Chapel of the Ecce Homo Convent is below current ground level. The
wall behind the Altar incorporates a Roman Arch. Probably a bit later
than the time of Christ, the Arch represents not just the architecture
and the public buildings of Rome, but something of the power of the
Empire. There was one super-power at the time, and it bestrode the
world. The Arch represents that period. In time it became a ruin as
the Empire crumbled, and now is an integral part of a church building.
Sitting in the silence of the church before the service started, I was
able just to look at the Arch and the wall into which is has been
built. In the very special circumstances of today, and the prospect of
war, there came to mind Revelation 11:15 - "The kingdoms of this world
are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ, and he shall
reign for ever." How strange that an arch which represents the power
and affluence of the Roman Empire should now be part of a Christian
Church - the founder of which was executed by these same Romans. Sic
transit gloria mundi.
I am sure that we are not unique in having a sense of foreboding, as
to what is going to happen in Iraq. Certainly none of the people with
whom I speak have any optimism about the outcome of the war. Today it
has been hard to share in worship, and say the Lord's Prayer. Many's
the time I have said that the Kingdom of God will come in due course -
but it would be nice to think that we would be preparing for it by
getting better. It takes a bit more effort to see signs of getting
better. So, coming into the church this evening I was not feeling all
that positive. Strangely, sitting just looking at the Arch somehow put
things into a different perspective. It seemed to be saying that over
the long period of time, the powerful got their come-uppance. There
came into mind the confrontation between Jesus and those who were
upset at the exuberance of the welcome given to him on the Mount of
Olives. If people were silenced, he said, then the stones would cry
out. In a calming sort of way, the stones of the Arch were giving
their own silent witness to the transience of the power of a
super-power. I found their silence eloquent, and so there came a
certain lifting of some of the foreboding. Sadly, there will be
destruction. The superpower will inflict it on Iraq. Our local
superpower will probably also inflict it on the West Bank and Gaza.
On the BBC World Service this evening there is the news of a young
American being crushed to death by an Israeli army bulldozer as she
tried to protest about the demolition of a house in the southern end
of the Gaza strip.
The Gospel reading at the service this evening ended with these words
:
"I have told you this so that you may find peace in me. In the world
you will have trouble, but be brave; I have conquered the world."
I will add here an excerpt which I typed from the Ha'aretz Weekend
Magazine, and which I might have put in next week's letter. Putting it
here will save space in the next letter
Some of you may remember the raid that the Israeli army carried out on
Gaza, during which a woman in the ninth month of her pregnancy was
killed. Although a bit long, (miss it out if you wish) here is the
opening of an article entitled :"Save the children, Shukri!" written
by Gideon Levy, and published in Ha'aretz Magazine, March 14th.
New widower Shukri al-Makadama lies on the floor of his brother's
house, lighting cigarette after cigarette. His neck is encased in
plaster, due to a possible fractured vertebra caused by a wall falling
on top of him. He mourns his dead wife and moans in pain.
Staring at the ceiling, he quietly describes - in fluent Hebrew, for
all the years he worked in Tel Aviv - the events of that terrible
night when the Israel Defence Forces destroyed his house and his
world, and killed his wife, Noha al Makadama, a mother of 10, who was
in her ninth month of pregnancy.
Late one night last week the Army came to demolish the house of the
family of teenage terrorist Sami Abdel Salam, who was shot dead on
February 9 after he and several others started shooting at IDF
soldiers in the El Bureij refugee camp in Gaza. In the process, they
also demolished the homes of seven other families -- without warning
and while the residents were inside. Before she lost consciousness,
Noha, who was due to give birth any day, managed to shout to her
husband to protect the children and to hand him the small purse that
held the money she was saving for a washing machine. He shows us the
blue purse, still full of coins.
Noha was buried alive under the rubble of her house last Monday, and
her unborn child died with her. Brigadier General Gadi Shemani, the
Gaza division commander, said the next day that the IDF has "no
evidence" of the woman's death, and thereby exempted himself and his
soldiers from any responsibility for the despicable killing. Defence
Minister Shaul Mofaz said something similar and just as outrageous at
the cabinet meeting. So, as a service to the Defence Minister and the
Division Commander, the full story of the killing of Noha al-Makadama
and her unborn child, crushed to death when their home was demolished
by the IDF, is hereby presented.
Quotations from remarks by Shukri : "This Sharon is increasing the
hatred. I have 10 children. What am I going to tell them? That the
Jews killed their mother? Not true. Only Sharon and Mofaz killed their
mother." "Where are your religious people? Where are the Haredim, when
they see children being slaughtered? Is this what it says in your
Torah? That you should kill children? That you should kill pregnant
women? What can I do? This is my fate. But I don't hate the Jews and
anyone who knows me - I'm sure that they're angry and they would have
come to visit me if there ware able to. I send regards to all the
people who knew me in Tel Aviv."
(Gideon Levy) A week after the killing and destruction, the IDF
spokesperson's office had this to say in response to questions : 'The
IDF regrets the harming of innocents and investigates each incident.
The investigation of this incident has not yet been completed. Once it
is ,we will be able to answer the reporter's questions.'
(Suggestion - a letter to the Israeli Embassy in your country, asking
for the Report on the Incident - and keeping on asking until it is
delivered.)
Clarence.
top
Circular
Letter No 117
7th March 2003
Last week I wrote about Bassem, an architect from
Bethlehem. . It elicited the following response from a Jewish
correspondent in the USA : "Clarence: Your story re this architect is
illustrative of the unfortunate results of conflict. As you know,
Arafat's Tanzim terrorist forces chose the Christian town of Beit Jala
as an outpost from which its snipers shot at Jerusalem. They hid in
Christian homes, schools and churches so that return fire would rain
death and destruction on Christians. As far back as l997, the London
Times observed "Life in Bethlehem has become insufferable for many
members of the dwindling Christian minorities".
Information is supposed to be the material on which
people base their discussions before the reach decisions. It is also
supposed to be the material which enables people to judge decisions and
actions.
There is a regular stream of articles in the Press
here about who knew what, and did what, in Europe, prior to and during
the Second World War – with relation to the persecution of the Jewish
communities across Europe. At the risk of generalisation, I think that a
widely-held view would be that, although some individuals performed
heroic and often dangerous actions to assist Jewish people as they tried
to escape from persecution, the majority did nothing, whether because
they knew little, or because they did not want to get involved.
A full page article in the Week’s End section of
Ha’aretz on Feb 28th, entitled “They just did what they knew
best" contains this sentence : "The myth of the heroic Dutch who
fought the Nazi occupiers and saved Jews has been nurtured ever since
World War II – not only in Holland, but in Israel as well. The truth is
different.” The article sets out the conventional picture of the
Dutch as “5% of the Dutch saved Jews, 90% fought actively against the
Nazi occupations, and only 5% collaborated.” However, it reports on a
study that has proved that there were more volunteers in Holland for the
Waffen SS than in any other country in Western Europe. How much did the
ordinary person know? How much did they ignore? What did they do about
it? All the questions are asked in the context of the responsibility of
the Dutch people for what happened in their country to Jewish people.
One of the topics which regularly comes up in
conversations here is why the Israeli public make so little comment upon
what is being done by the Israeli army and security personnel in the
West Bank and Gaza and why they allow to happen what we who have to
travel into the West Bank see on a regular basis. I try to share with
you some of the things that Joan and I see, and which we experience, as
a way of giving you some information on which you can reflect, act or
whatever. Much of the second-hand information which I pass on comes from
journalists, many of whom are “radical”, “left-wing”, etc. One thing of
which they cannot be accused, (an accusation which could be levelled at
any person who is non-Jewish) is anti-Semitism, as they are themselves
Jewish. One place where you can read some of their work is in the web
site of Gush Shalom :
http://www.gush-shalom.org/english/index.html
(English). One article that appeared recently was about this whole
matter of who knows what, and what do they do about it. It was written
by a woman Gila Svirsky who is active in the "Peace Movement" and is
entitled “The Wall of Denial”. The lives of Palestinians in the
occupied territories have been thoroughly disrupted since Sharon came to
power, far more than under any preceding Israeli prime minister. The
mystery, however, is not the reign of terror - this is no mystery under
Sharon - but the indifference of Israeli citizens to that behavior. How
is it possible that through two and a half years of increasingly cruel
conduct of our army, the Israeli public has had almost nothing to say
about soldiers...
*** urinating on school computers and defecating on
the rugs of homes they have garrisoned for use; *** accidentally
demolishing the homes of innocent people that happen to be near the
homes deliberately destroyed *** preventing the residents of entire
cities from leaving their houses for weeks on end (no exceptions - not
for chemotherapy, dialysis, childbirth, buying food, attending school,
or visiting your sick mother); *** damaging 27 Palestinian ambulances
beyond repair and wounding 187 medical personnel [www.palestinercs.org]
; *** and assassinating people without the niceties of trial and due
process, not to mention reckless shootings in which 126 innocent
children aged 13 or younger (including 19 toddlers and infants aged 5 or
younger!) have lost their lives [www.btselem.org].
Why, I am trying to understand, are we Israelis so
blind to this brutality? Where are the expressions of revulsion by
decent Israelis? Why don't the major newspapers report these
heart-wrenching stories (not just the liberal and much
smaller-circulation Ha'aretz)? Why didn't a single Jewish political
party in the recent election criticize the government for its policy of
collective punishment? Why are the brave young men and women who refuse
to carry out these crimes disparaged in the media, while even Peace Now
and the Meretz party don't come to their support? Why are only a handful
of people willing to apply the label 'war crime' to the deeds of the
army - deeds that merit this designation under any objective reading of
the international instruments of law?
The lack of outrage and compassion in Israel is
difficult to understand. Is it a reflection of the fact that Israelis
are uninformed? Or are they aware and indifferent?
I believe that Israelis do know the truth. So the
question is, why is there indifference? Here are three reasons, though
I'm sure there are more:
- First, the media gets some of the blame –( and she goes on to
elaborate on this, as she does on the next two headings )
- Second, Palestinian violence against Israeli civilians provides
the cover for Israelis to focus on our own pain and fear, and to frame
the pain of the Palestinians as 'just desserts' or an inevitable
byproduct of our 'war on terrorism'.
- Third, much blame goes to our political and rabbinical leaders who
engage in fear mongering and dehumanization of the other. President
Katsav who told a group of bar-mitzvah boys, "The Palestinians don't
behave as if they come from the same planet as we do."
I said last week that there would be a comment on the
complexion of the new government. In any comment, there is the natural
bias of the commentator to be taken into consideration. There were those
who thought that Mrs Thatcher was the greatest leader the UK has had,
there were those who thought that she was the greatest disaster.
Allow Uri Avnery, another of the left-wing, radical
Israeli journalists to provide the comment, in an article quoted in Gush
Shalom, of 1st March, 2003.
“Also wrong are those who believe that Sharon has no
vision. He certainly has one. And what a vision it is! He does indeed
want to enter history as the man who realized the dream of generations.
But this is not the dream of peace, about which he prattles day and
night. Peace interests him as last year's snow. He strives for an aim
that seems to him vastly more important: to fulfil the aim of Zionism as
he understands it: to create a Jewish state that will comprise (at
least) all the land between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River, and
if possible without Arabs.
When one understands the aim, the composition of the
new government is eminently reasonable. It is custom-made. Sharon at the
helm. The army in the hands of Shaul Mofaz, the most brutal Arab-fighter
of them all. The police in charge of Tsachi Hanegby, a man who has a
criminal record, sentenced for organizing racist hoodlum attacks upon
Arab students, and himself having been investigated by his now
subordinate police officers for suspicion of corruption and bribery.
Moreover, Sharon and his sons' investigations for many billion-dollar
corruption, money laundering and foul financing of election funds, are
still on the table. Eytam ( who is on record as favouring the ‘transfer’
of Arabs,) building housing units in the settlements. Liberman, himself
a settler, responsible for the roads. The treasury, that must finance
all this, in the hands of Netanyahu.
Monday 3rd Shukran came to lunch, on her
way home from hospital where she had been for a check-up. She brought
her Mum, one of her brothers, and Victoria. A good time was had by all.
She is the little one having corrective surgery to deal with Apert’s
Syndrome.
Those who have driven through Jerusalem will recall
that as Route 1 makes its way north from New Gate, it first descends and
then climbs again. A few weeks ago, a few new yellow road signs appeared
just halfway up the incline, written in Hebrew and English. The English
reads : “Cohanim drive in the left-most lane.” It illustrates the
complexities of life for members of the Clan “Cohen” –the priestly
class, who have to maintain their purity. Coming into contact with the
bones of dead people will render them impure, and needing to undergo
purification rituals. It has recently been “discovered” that there may
be a cemetery under part of Route 1, and so to ensure that Cohanim do
not become inadvertently impure, there is the warning that they have to
drive in the outer lane. After a short distance, there is a notice
advising them that they can drive in the inner lane with impunity.
One of the saddest parts of life here is the way in
which the killings go on.
Monday 3rd March – Front Page Ha’aretz. 3
shot dead by IDF in Gaza Strip. 72 Palestinians killed last month in
West Bank and Gaza Strip – including 3 children under the age of 10 and
4 people over 50 years old. 8 of these were killed in IDF assassinations
Tuesday 4th March - Front Page Ha'aretz.
IDF kills 9 in Gaza, West Bank raids. Among the dead a pregnant woman
and a 16 year old boy
Wednesday 5th March Page 2 Ha'aretz.
Bedouin, aged 75, killed in Gaza; 16 year old shot dead in Jenin.
Thursday 6th March Front Page Ha'aretz. 15
killed, 40 wounded in Haifa bus bomb
Friday 7th March Front Page Ha'aretz 11
Palestinians killed, over 80 wounded in Jabalya (Gaza) raid ; ate least
half are civilian dead.
. ( Clarence. On a pro rata basis, comparing the
population of the USA with that of Palestine at a ratio of 200:3, the
death toll of Palestinians this week represents 1,666 people killed in
the States, and for the UK, on a basis of 50:3, something like 416. On a
similar basis comparing the population of the USA with that of Israel at
a ratio of 200:6, the death toll of Israelis this week represents 500
people killed in the States, and for the UK, on a basis of 50:6,
something like 125.)
Tertullian, who lived from approx 160 - 225 AD, wrote
in his book "Apology" : Plures efficimus quoties metimur a vobis, semen
est Sanguis Christianorum, the traditional translation of which is "The
blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church." If there is any truth
in his words, then this week so far has seen an enormous sowing of seeds
of enmity.
What will happen here during and after the War in
Iraq does not bear thinking about.
In spite of all this, the bright red anemones are
carpeting fields and open spaces, cyclamens are all through the woods,
the birds are singing and nesting. We met a couple this week who were
overjoyed with life - they had just adopted a baby, and were thrilled at
this new chapter in their lives.
Stay well.
Joan and Clarence
top
Circular Letter No 116
1st March 2003
Some time ago I shared with you a response to one of my letters from a
person in New York, suggesting that I might be a little bit biased. I
share with you this week two responses from a Jewish correspondent in
US.
“Greetings Clarence: Since you refer to "242" frequently, perhaps you
ought to read what it actually says: It does not require Israel to
withdraw from all the territories gained as a result of the l967 war. It
restricts itself to calling for withdrawal "from territories" while
recognizing the right to live within secure and recognized boundaries.”
“Clarence: Hope you are enjoying the snow (We had several centimetres
this week). With regard to 242, I'm sure you know that the UN Resolution
adopted November 22, l967, a carefully worded resolution introduced by
Britain's Lord Caradon did not require Israel to return to pre-June 5,
1967 lines. Such an interpretation was explicitly not the intention of
the framers of 242, nor does the language include any such requirement.
Lord Caradon said "It would have been wrong to demand that Israel return
to its positions of June 4, l967, because those positions were
undesirable and artificial. They were just armistice lines. That's why
we didn't demand that the Israelis return to them" U.S. Ambassador to
the U. N. Arthur Goldberg said that there would be "less than a complete
withdrawal" because "Israel's prior frontiers had proved to be notably
insecure".
Below, UN 242 and the Preambular Clauses, can speak for themselves.
UN SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 242
Resolution 242 has inspired more writing than any other. This is due to
a subtle difference between the English and the French texts (both
official) which refer to withdrawal "from territories occupied" and "des
territoires occupés" (from the territories occupied) respectively. The
Israeli government would only consider a restrictive interpretation of
the English version which would allow them to hold onto certain occupied
territories, without taking into account, however, the second preambular
clause, emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory
by war.
"The Security Council,
Expressing its continuing concern with the grave situation in the Middle
East;
Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war
and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State
in the area live in security;
Emphasizing further that all Member States in their acceptance of the
Charter of the United Nations have undertaken a commitment to act in
accordance with article 2 of the Charter;
1. Affirms that the fulfilment of Charter principles requires the
establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which
should include the application of both the following principles:
- withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the
recent conflict;
- termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for
and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and
political independence of every State in the area and their right to
live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats
or acts of force;
2. Affirms further the necessity:
- for guaranteeing freedom of navigation through international waterways
in the area;
- for achieving a just settlement of the refugee problem;
- for guaranteeing the territorial inviolability and political
independence of every State in the area, through measures including the
establishment of demilitarized zones;
3. Requests the Secretary general to designate a Special Representative
to proceed to the Middle East to establish and maintain contacts with
the States concerned in order to promote agreement and assist efforts to
achieve a peaceful and accepted settlement in accordance with the
provisions and principles in this resolution;
4. Requests the Secretary General to report to the Security Council on
the progress of the efforts of the Special Representative as soon as
possible." Adopted unanimously at the 1382nd meeting on 22 Dec. 1967
For some other information go to the United Nations and the question of
Palestine .
www.un.org/Depts/dpa/qpal/
Friday. All that is academic – or is it? I went to Bethlehem this
afternoon, to see a friend who has a home there, but in which for the
present he and his wife feel unable to live. I thought you might like to
hear a bit of his story.
Bassem is an architect, who had a thriving business based at his home
and office in Bethlehem, just across the road from Rachel’s Tomb. He was
born in Jerusalem, and married a woman from Bethlehem. He bought his
land and the house in Bethlehem in 1976, and lived there until late
2000, when it became unbearable. At that time there was considerable
shooting, and the Israeli army took over an unfinished apartment block
on the plot adjoining the back of his garden. From it, they conducted
fire towards Beit Jala. The Israeli army also took over the ground
across the road from the side of his plot, on which they constructed a
small base. So, at that time, he was subjected to the noise of the army
coming and going to its base at all hours of the day and night, and
subjected on many nights to the firing of machine guns from the building
at the back of his house – perhaps 30 metres away. Understandably, he
and his wife were unable to continue enduring this, and so they moved
into Jerusalem where they rented an apartment – from which they can see
their own home! That was 2 years ago, and they are still in Jerusalem.
The direct route to his house and office is a 5-minute journey down the
main road. For him to try to take this road now can mean anything up to
a couple of hours, depending on how many people are waiting to go
through the check-point and the attitude of the soldiers. Most of the
time, rather than subject himself to this ordeal and possible
humiliation, he takes a detour of a few miles, and ends up getting a
taxi from Beit Jala to his office, as I said within sight of the
apartment where he and his wife now live.
With his move to Jerusalem, and all the troubles that he faced in
getting to and from Bethlehem to his place of work, it was not
surprising that his business was affected. He employed 15
architect/engineers in 2000, working on projects in Bethlehem and other
parts of the West Bank, in East Jerusalem, and for the Municipality of
Jerusalem. Now he employs 5 people, and for the past two years he has
just managed to pay his expenses.
Bad as all that is, it was multiply compounded last week when he was
handed a notice from the Israeli army. It reads :
Israel Defense Forces.
Orders to Seize lands No 03/14/T
According to my authorities as a Military Chief Commander in the Region
of Judea and Samaria, and as I believe that it is imperative for
military reasons due to the special security situation in the region, I
order the following :
The “Map” signed with a scale of 1 : 5000 and attached to the order is
an essential part of this tender.
The “Lands” : An area of land which is 18 dunums marked in red in the
map that exists in Bethlehem :
Block 28103 : parcels 20, 68
Block 28029, parcels 19, 32, 29, 36
Block 28106, parcels 53,23,22,21,20.
I announce by that the above mentioned lands are seized for military
reasons.
The IDF seize the lands and have an absolute control over it that is
given to the office of the central command officer of lands who is
responsible in the Ministry of Defense.
These copies are to be given by the District Co-ordination Office “The
DCO” of Bethlehem to the owners of the land.
Copies are found with maps for those who are interested in the following
places :
DCO of Bethlehem
Offices of the Juridical advisor in the region
The office of the commander responsible in the Ministry of Defence in
the civil administration.
Office responsible of absentee and public lands in the civil
administration.
The owners of land have the right to go to the DCO in Bethlehem in order
to get more information about their right of land use expenses and
compensation.
The validity of this order starts at the date signed till 31.12.2005.
The name of this order is “Order to seize lands No 03/14/T (Judea and
Samaria) 2003.
Mosheh Kaplenski, Chief Commander of the Israel Defence Forces in Judea
and Samaria, 9.2.2003.
The map attached to this notice shows that the Israeli army intend to
build a wall down the middle of the road into Bethlehem, and that on one
side of it, they will seize the lands and buildings listed in the order.
This wall will pass on two sides of the property of Bassem. The purpose
of it will be to ensure safe passage for Jewish people who wish to go to
pray at Rachel’s Tomb. The wall will be anything up to 8 metres high.
Among the properties seized are dwelling houses, and it is unclear how
the families living there will be able to continue to live. Will they be
able to get to work, assuming there is any work for them? Will they be
able to get to shops? Will the children be able to get to school? And so
on. Also among the properties are several factories and manufacturing
establishments – a textile factory belonging to the family of the Mayor
of Bethlehem, a diamond-stonecutting tool making business, a mother of
pearl workshop. Etc.
Assuming that this is actually carried out, Bassem will be the owner of
a property with a concrete wall up to 8 metres high on two sides, and
looking into his property from the rear, from an unfinished apartment
block, is an Israeli army post. He reckons that his property – house and
office, - is now virtually worthless.
It is impossible to convey the enormity of this sort of action, which at
the stroke of a pen can completely wreck the livelihood of a whole
community. A Jewish friend who was having supper with us last night, -
one of the “peace” camp – is reading a book by Suetonius about the lives
of some of the Roman Emperors. In it she read again of the torture of
“small cuts” - don’t kill a person outright, but do it a little bit at a
time. She sees her government doing this to Palestine and the
Palestinians. And this is just one of the “cuts” being made daily, as
roads are built through the West Bank, settlements are enlarged, land
confiscated for the Wall/Fence to separate Israel and Palestine.
All the grand words of Mr Blair in No 10 Downing Street in October 2000,
when shaking hands with Mr Arafat, and saying that UN 242 would be
implemented – where are they now?
Documents have been lodged with the High Court in Israel to appeal
against this order. I understand that a judgement will be given within a
few weeks. Would you like to write to the Israeli Embassy in whatever
country you live in and ask about this?
On a different note, the little girl Shukran about whom we wrote before
Christmas has had her major operation. She will be taken on Monday to
the hospital for a check-up, and we hope that on her way home she will
be brought to our house. More news about her perhaps next week.
Entirely different is an excerpt from an e-mail that came in this week
from a friend from the USA.
What with all the sadness and trauma going on in the world at the
moment, it is worth reflecting on the death of a very important person
which almost went un-noticed. Larry LaPrise, the man who wrote "The
Hokey Pokey" died peacefully at age 83. The most traumatic part for his
family was getting him into the coffin. They put his left leg in....
....And then the trouble started.
Stay well. God bless.
Joan and Clarence
top
Circular Letter No 115
22nd February 2003
"Tot homines, quot sententiae.” As you are all very well educated in the
Classics, I would not dream of offending you by translating this saying
– but it has something to do with there being as many opinions as there
are people. Such wisdom is evinced by watching the pictures of the
Rallies last Saturday all over the world – some seeing them as answers
to prayers, others as fulfillment of nightmares.
For what they are worth, here are the two versions of the English
language papers here on Sunday 16th February. Guess which one is from
Jerusalem Post, and which from Ha’aretz.
“ARAB ISRAELIS, LEFTISTS PROTEST US WAR PLANS. Some 1,500 people calling
for the US to abort its planned attack on Iraq marched in Tel Aviv on
Saturday night, joining a rally at the Tel Aviv Museum of Art that was
as much a protest against the Israeli government as it was against the
putative American targeting of Iraq. The marchers gathered outside Tel
Aviv’s Cinemateque, where they waved the orange banners of Balad and the
red flags of the communist Hadash party. They chanted anti-American and
anti-Israeli slogans to the well know rhythm of Israeli-Palestinian
peace demonstrations.”
“ISRAELI, PALESTINIANS JOIN ANTI-WAR PROTEST. About 1,500 Israelis and
Palestinians gathered at the Cinemateque in Tel Aviv last night and
marched through Tel Aviv, adding their voice to hundreds of thousands of
people around the world opposed to the looming U S war on Iraq. Jewish
men in kippas walked alongside Arab women in headscarves holding banners
reading ‘Israelis against Bush’s war’ and ‘War is not the answer.’”
Monday 17th Headlines.
Government approves Yishai’s plan to bring 20,000 Falashmura (Ethiopian
Jews who converted to Christianity) to Israel.
- IDF readies for major Gaza strike. Six Hamas members killed in
Gaza Strip, two dead in Nablus.
- Jerusalem’s first ultra-Orthodox mayor to replace (outgoing Mayor)
Olmert.
- Expect even more terror in 2003, says police boss. (Israeli
statistics : 2002, 456 people were killed and 2,300 were injured. In
2001, 208 people were killed and 1,525 injured.) The Police Chief
makes no mention of the number of Palestinian killed and injured.
- IDF wants to double capacity of Ketsiot (Detention Centre near
Be’er Sheva) to 2,400 inmates.
One of the privileges that comes to a Minister of St Andrew’s
Jerusalem is being on the official Invitation List for such events as
the Swearing-in of a new Knesset. So, on 17th February, I duly
presented myself at the Knesset to join the others who had been
invited to witness the Swearing-in of the 16th Knesset, the members of
which had been elected on January 28th. But first, one had to get in!
Although my name was clearly on the invitation, and my Passport said I
was whom I claimed to be, at two check points I was politely asked to
wait for a moment while a superior officer was called. The reason what
that the slip of paper with my name printed on it had become partially
detached from the invitation card. Was I an impostor, or was it a
genuine invitation? On both occasions it was decided that it was
genuine, and so I was admitted to the Knesset.
There is a section reserved for “Church dignitaries” – one of the rare
occasions when I get a chance to sit near the Greek Orthodox Patriarch
and the Papal Nuncio. I was able to have a conversation with Elias
Chacour, and it was interesting to hear him say that while there has
been some economic improvement for Israeli Arabs, there is a great
crisis of identity among his people. .) It is understandable that
there is a crisis of identity, when among the Members of the Knesset
sworn in yesterday are some who wish to “transfer” all the Arabs out
of Israel. Two major themes in the speech of President Katsav dealt
with Terrorism, and with the need for the political parties to work to
protect Israel’s democracy and combat the negative attitudes towards
the political system. Also, in one part of his speech President Katsav
appealed to Israeli Arab leaders to take full pride in being Israelis.
In another part he referred to the need to raise the standard of
living in Arab communities in Israel. (This particular matter was the
subject of a Petition to the High Court on Monday – demanding that the
Government implement its multi-year programme for development in Arab
communities. According to the Petition, while the monies originally
earmarked for Arab development constitute some 6% of overall
development funds, some government ministries never spent any of their
share for that purpose. Special allocations were included in the 2002
Budget for this purpose, but data in the hands of the petitioners
indicates most of the money ended up going back to the Reserves). The
other speaker yesterday was Mr. Peres, in his role as most senior
Member of the Knesset, of which he has been a Member since 1959. He,
too, spoke of the need to end terrorism, and said “Peace is waiting
for a Palestinian government of peace, and for an Israeli peace
process.”
How hard it is to fit rhetoric with words – from whatever source the
words come. All the following are taken from Ha’aretz, Tuesday 18th
Feb.
IDF kills leading Hamas man in Gaza – ambushing him in his car and
wounding him. He later died in hospital.
Also on Monday, two Palestinian gunmen were killed and four others
wounded trying to block a home demolition, that of the man the army
alleges is responsible for Saturday’s deadly attack on an Israeli tank
(in which 4 soldiers were killed).
On Sunday 6 Hamas operative were killed while handling a mysterious
unmanned drone – reported by some people to have been booby trapped.
State (of Israel) says that Palestinian Authority is responsible for
its own gas masks. The State last night asked the High Court of
Justice to reject the petition by human rights groups that want the
court to order the state to hand out gas mask kits to all 3,000,000
Palestinians, arguing that as the Palestinian Authority is responsible
for heath, shelter construction fire prevention and emergency rescue
services in the territories, so it should be responsible for the
provision of gas masks.
Arab Mayor asks Mofaz (Minister of Defence) for gas masks. The Mayor
of Umm al-Fahm (an Arab town in Israel) has sent an urgent letter to
Defence Minister Mofaz, asking for his intervention to have the Home
Front Command open a gas-mask distribution station in the town. Umm
al-Fahm has a population of 40,000 and the station could supply all
the surrounding Arab villages, which have a combined population of
100,000. When the Mayor approached the officer in charge of
distribution in the Haifa region, he was told that the Home Front does
not have sufficient manpower and the staff is not prepared to go to
Arab towns and villages. The officer suggested instead that residents
of Umm al-Fahm and the surroundings go to two other centres.
It is in the Herald Tribune that there is a report about the possible
annexation of land to the north of Jerusalem to enable Jewish people
to come to Rachel’s Tomb to worship. Claire Anastas, 34, spent most of
the last week trying to keep her four children playing or studying
while they were cooped up in their home there, under Israeli curfew.
Then, on Sunday, the army informed her that it would soon build a new
wall, at least 7.5 metres high, outside her house. The wall will
separate her neighbourhood from the rest of Bethlehem, and her
children from their schools. Under the plan, Palestinians like Anastas
will be left on the Israeli side of the wall, and they will have to
pass though an army checkpoint in the wall to reach the rest of
Palestinian Bethlehem.
Is it any wonder, given the items from one day’s Newspaper, that there
is a crisis of identity among Israeli Arabs, and also among Israeli
Jews, as they wonder who they are, and what is being done in their
name, and how they can ever find some sort of peace?
Wednesday evening. A “Prayer for Peace in Iraq and the Middle East
Service” held in St Stephen’s Latin Catholic Church had a congregation
of 250 – 300. Most of those there were Palestinian Christians, and it
was mostly in Arabic, so our comprehension was a bit limited! The
Intercessions were led by representatives of different denominations –
and led in Arabic, Aramaic, English, French and German Greek and
Italian.
Thursday morning. There is a monthly Prayer Breakfast for MEN called
MEN in Ministry. I sometimes go, as it is the one time in the month
when I can meet this particular group of men. Note the Men – their
theology does not allow them to recognise that women might be
ministers also! There is breakfast, then a time of sharing
information, and a time of prayer. I was sitting beside a person who
is a leader in Jerusalem of what is called “Christian Friends of
Israel”. The man beside him was unwise enough to ask me how I was, and
when I said that I was not feeling great, he wanted to know why. So we
got into a conversation about the seizure of land and houses in
Bethlehem. The CFI mans asked me to understand that the seizure of
land etc was all to do with security. The other person said that he
would not now go to Bethlehem, as he would feel uncomfortable and
perhaps unsafe, so how about me passing on greetings to a person in
Bethlehem..
Just before we were ready to “pray” – having heard the concerns of the
men present, one person remarked that none of those who had spoken had
mentioned the fact that there is the possibility of a war just round
the corner!
Friday. The litany goes on – Iraq has not obeyed UN Resolutions,
therefore we will have to attack Iraq to get rid of its leaders, and
hopefully find some who will agree with UN Resolutions.
There is of course another UN Resolution on the table, No 242 – which
has to do with withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territory which
Israel occupied in the 1967 war. Recognising that this Resolution
talks about both sides having to comply with it, one wonders why there
is noise about the removal of Mr. Arafat, and none about the removal
of Mr. Sharon.
Ha’aretz, Friday 21st February. “The Government issues tender for
Efrat construction.” Efrat is that settlement to the south of
Bethlehem which is spreading across the hills at a great rate, and
which is part of the encirclement of Bethlehem. Never mind that the
Israeli government has spoken about settlements only expanding to meet
the needs of their current population, and never mind the fact that
there are empty homes already in Efrat – “The Ministry of Housing and
construction yesterday morning issued a tender for the building of 126
residential units in the Olive Hill neighbourhood of the West bank
settlement of Efrat, while the Finance Ministry agreed to invest NIS 6
million on road lighting in the territories.”
The article above this one is headed “2 Palestinians killed, 2
soldiers hurt.” In the course of it, there is this paragraph: “Since
the attack on an Israeli tank on Saturday, when four Israeli soldiers
were killed, 29 Palestinians have been killed, including at least 8
Hamas members.”
Friday afternoon saw us heading north to Ramallah for a party! An
Irish couple who live there had decided that, war or no war, they were
having a party. So about 20 folk gathered for a while, - good food,
good wine, and good conversation. However, it was all an illusion of
goodness. On the way there, we had to drive on Settler Roads, we had
to pass through a checkpoint, and on the way back through 2
checkpoints, and have the visual assault on our eyes of seeing the
spreading band of settlements round Ramallah, doing to it what the
Efrat and other Settlements are doing to Bethlehem. To get to the
checkpoint going into Ramallah, you have to turn off the main north
road to Nablus. Last time I was there, there had been a sign-post. Now
there is a cluster of caravans, and hey-presto, you have a new
Settlement. The Israeli government will share in telling the UN to get
on with its business of making Iraq obey UN resolutions. It will, at
the same time, tell the UN what to do with its resolutions about the
building of settlements.
At the party, I talked with N. He is Palestinian, now working with a
UN agency, and so has a UN travel document, and travels in a UN marked
vehicle. He went to Nablus a few weeks ago, to see his family – the
first time that he had been able to go for 6 months, so it was the
first time that his family, living 25 miles from him, had seen this 4
month old baby daughter. Notwithstanding his UN travel papers, and his
UN car, he was still held up at check points, still searched, still
humiliated. Within Nablus, his family had their own small factory
making snack foods. His extended family of about 25 people drew their
livelihood from this factory, and in addition it employed 60 people.
The Israeli army decided that it would make a good building to house
soldiers – so it has been taken over. No redress, no compensation, no
possibility of getting it back – so all the dependants of the 60
workers are affected, as are the owners.
Sorry, overrun the space again. Have a good weekend. God bless. Love
from Joan and Clarence.
top
Circular Letter No 114
15th February 2003
It is rarely easy to be a critic of your own people, your own country.
Yet, there are those here who do voice criticism. Sometimes it is a
Palestinian being critical about the administration of Mr. Arafat. In
the Press in Israel, it is more often Israeli journalists being critical
of the actions of the Israeli government and army. Two such people are
Amira Haas and Gideon Levy. Both write for Ha’aretz, and both are
trenchantly critical of what is happening on the West Bank and what it
is doing to the soul of Israel.
An article by Gideon Levy on 9th February commenced : “A War in Iraq
will soon break out, and with it a great darkness will descend on events
in the territories. As long as what goes on there doesn’t affect the
war’s execution, no one in the world will take an interest. No one will
so much as cast a glance at the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. This is
the time to caution us all that under the cover of that darkness, grave
things may come to pass. Not that there is much light there now, either:
for some time, it has seemed that anything goes in the war against the
Palestinians. The fact is that there are no longer any voices of outrage
over the situation in the territories. Not about flechette shells fired
at a soccer field, not about innocent farmers who are shot to death, not
about the demolition of homes at an appalling rate – 22 in one day – not
about the destruction of an entire outdoor market, or about the razing
of the home of a wanted individual who has not yet been apprehended,
burying his tenant Kamala Abu –Said, aged 65, under the ruins. All these
event took place in the course of last week.”
Thursday 13th February. The main front-page headline in Ha’aretz today
is “ Israel recalls envoy following Belgian court ruling on Sharon.” The
story begins “Foreign Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday recalled
Israel’s Ambassador to Belgium after the Belgian Supreme Court ruled
that Defence Ministry Director-General Amos Yaron could be prosecuted
for his involvement in the Sabra and Chatila massacres in 1982 in
Beirut, when we was commander of the IDF forces in the Lebanese capital
at the time. The court also ruled that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon could
be put on trial for his alleged involvement in the affair, but only
after he ceases to be Prime Minister, when he no longer has diplomatic
immunity.”
On an inside Opinion Page, there is an article by Rabbi David Forman,
Chairman of Rabbis for Human Rights, headed “Put Sharon on trial. Here.”
He writes about the collapse of the military ethic, and sees it
connected with the career in the army and now in the office of Prime
Minister, of Mr. Sharon. He writes, “It’s possible that for the Prime
Minister, ‘all is fair in love and war.’ We have a Jewish answer to that
: “Justice, and justice alone, you shall pursue,” (Deuteronomy 16 : 20).
The rabbis say that the word justice appears twice to say that a just
cause must be achieved through just means. That biblical commandment is
the earliest form of the IDF’s principle of purity of arms.’
It would be inaccurate to say that the main topic of conversation is the
conduct of the Israeli army on the West Bank and in Gaza. But the
quotations above are indicative of the enormous sensitivity of the
Israeli government to what is happening in the world outside Israel, and
the need it sees to react to any decision which may pose a potential
threat. They are also indicative of the deep divisions within Israeli
society, though it has to be admitted that at present the views of Rabbi
Forman are those of a tiny minority – or of a tiny minority that is
prepared to be vocal.
What is the main topic of conversation is The War. Are you leaving? When
are you leaving? For how long are you leaving? It is impossible to hold
a conversation without this topic being raised at the very outset.
On Tuesday, we had a meeting of the School Board of Tabeetha School –
the Church of Scotland School in Jaffa. One of the items on the Agenda
dealt with preparations for the War, and what has to be done. (Our
discussion was prefaced by a report that the American School north of
Tel Aviv has decided to adjust its academic calendar with effect from
21st February. It is ceasing full time classes and going on early
holidays, for 5 weeks. This is a recognition of the likely effect on the
school of families being evacuated from Israel. However some provision
has to be made for those pupils who are Israelis, and those who will not
be leaving the country. Also for the ongoing education of children who
may be out of their normal environment for some time.)
As Tabeetha is an accredited school in the Israeli system, we naturally
have to be subject to the decisions of the Ministry of Education, and
the Government. If the Government closes all schools, then Tabeetha will
close. If the Government keeps all schools open, then Tabeetha will stay
open. But being a fee-paying school, we also had to address the subject
of whether or not fees would have to be paid, if the school were to be
closed. What would be the status of any pupil where a family refused to
pay fees? What would be the status of any teacher who opted to leave the
country? Should there be a closure of the school for a prolonged period,
who will pay for the on-going costs, as people will have to be paid, but
there may well be no income from pupils?
Interestingly, while many diplomatic and secular organisations are
withdrawing some staff, no person working within any of the Churches,
and with whom I have had a conversation, has any other feeling than that
this is where they should be, and none are making any plans to leave the
country. There are probably two reasons behind such attitudes : the
relatively small perceived danger from any war, and the feeling that we
have to live through the difficult times with our Christian colleagues
here, and not just through the easy times.
Again in Thursday’s paper are the results of an Opinion Poll.
The chance of Israel being attacked. 37.2% - Iraq will not attack with
missiles. 18.5% - Iraq will attack with conventional missiles. 24.2% -
Iraq will attack with both conventional and non-conventional missiles.
20.1% - don’t know/no reply.
Should the US attack? 46.3% - should attack as soon as possible. 23.4% -
should attack only if mediation and inspection efforts fail. 20.4% -
should not attack. 9.9% - don’t know.
The security threat that most concerns you? 43.4% - Suicide bombers.
12.4% - Iraqi missile attack. 11.1% - Hezbollah missile attack. 20.5% -
all to the same degree. 9.1% - none of them. 3.5% - don’t know/no reply.
Whatever the pros and cons of a War, and the likelihood of Israel being
attacked or not attacked, it is a fact that organisations such as
hospitals are laying in stores. In the event of a war, it would not be
at all unlikely that there would be closures and curfews on the West
Bank – and what would hospitals do then if they did not have sufficient
food etc? From donations you have sent, assistance has been given to a
centre in Bethlehem which cares for traumatised children and their
families, and to a church programme to assist people with the purchase
of medicines. A real problem for the folk in Bethlehem, is that at the
moment there is yet another curfew, following the killing of an Israeli
soldier in Manger Square.
I mentioned last week the case of a farmer who had planted olive trees
where his former orchard had been uprooted. What I did not know at the
time was that the family of one of the women who come to church is
involved also. Over coffee she was asking about the gift by God of the
land to the Jewish people, which is the basis for the expansion of the
Jewish state. Yet, her family has documents to prove that it owns its
farm, which is slowly being taken over by Settlements. They have gone to
the Court, which has deferred hearing the case and making a decision.
She asked – what about the commandment not to steal? Does it not apply
to the Settlements also? Answers on a postcard please.
One evening this week Joan and I took a walk in our neighbourhood. We
passed many very imposing homes, and it brought back again to us the
enormity of the change that took place here in the space of a few days
and weeks in 1948. The owners of these imposing homes became, almost
overnight, homeless and refugees. I wonder how I would feel if I had to
walk past a house which had been my family home, and see that is now
belongs to someone else, who did not buy it, nor has ever paid for it –
just moved in when my family left in fear in 1948. We visited a Jewish
family not long ago, and in telling us how to find their home, they said
to come along their street, and they lived in the “Arab” house.
The life of the church goes on. After the service last week one of our
members said goodbye. She will be evacuated by the UN some time this
week or next – and may well be away for some months. An American family
has left for some months, for family, but also for security, reasons.
So, we are smaller than we were. It makes the choice of hymns
interesting – have we enough puff to sing a particular hymn? In the
Dormitian Abbey across the valley from us, there are daily prayers for
peace each afternoon at 1500 hours. This series of services will
culminate in a larger service next week. Sabeel, the Palestinian
Liberation Theology centre, is helping to organise an ecumenical service
next week, - mostly in Arabic – but with some English participation from
folk like us.
One of the anomalies of life here is that if you are working with the
Palestinian community, yet based in Jerusalem, you still need to have a
valid Visa from the Israeli government. Speaking with the Director of
the Lutheran World Federation which administers, among other things, the
Augusta Victoria Hospital, he said that his Visa has not yet been fully
renewed – he was given a shortened extension in the autumn and is still
awaiting an answer about his application. Similar experiences have been
reported by others who are also involved in what can be described as
“humanitarian” work.
Friday saw us going down once again to Idna, travelling most of the way
outside the Green Line, and having to go through a check point only a
few kms from the village. ‘Village’ is perhaps a bit of a misnomer to
those unaccustomed to the size of villages here – this one has some
17,000 inhabitants. It has been raining quite heavily, and this has a
detrimental effect on roads – ballast washed out and holes created.
Wherever one points the finger of blame or responsibility, it is always
hard to see the relative conditions of people living in Israel and those
living on the West Bank. This time, we brought home a large quantity of
goods from Idna, just as a precaution as one does not know what will
happen if and when a war will come. Not that one expects there to be
tourists to buy what we brought, but at least it will be here should
someone drop in for tea! This worry about what might happen on the West
Bank under the cover of a war in Iraq was voiced in a TV interview with
a former British Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, and he was expressing his
concerns.
Friday afternoon also saw the arrival of a message from the Board of
World Mission, about looking at preparing contingency plans should
events deteriorate further. It was interesting to share in a
conversation recently with an American couple – he is now an Israeli
citizen, while she is still an American citizen. Would they go? Who
would pay? If they go, where would they stay? Would she go? If so, for
how long? All these little things that add spice to life. We had two
meetings this week in which the matter came up, and in both it seemed
fairly clear to those of us here that our place is to be here.
While all this proceeds on the world stage, on the West Bank there are
still the closures, the curfews, and all the attendant misery attached
to them.
Saturday tea-time : Curfew lifted in Bethlehem for a few hours – we went
in, got more angels, handed over some donations, and then home – 15
minutes at the check-point, but an ambulance that came while we were
there was still there when we left.
A little bit of humour from a local paper. One of the weighty matters
discussed in an article this week was a Patron Saint for the Internet.
At the end of a long discussion of this “pressing” matter, the author
wrote “A Catholic Church spokesman told the news agencies that at this
stage, the Holy See has not yet made a decision on the patron saint of
the Internet. He also refused to confirm or deny the rumour that the
selection would eventually be the Archangel Gabriel.” One wonders how
they would consult Gabriel about his (or is it her?) views on the
matter!
Stay well. God bless. Love from us both.
Joan and Clarence.
top
Circular
Letter No 113
February 2003
Back once again in Jerusalem, it is time to try to
reflect on the things that we were able to do in Scotland and Prague, as
well as to try to get back into the swing of things here.
Scotland. We had some reasonably good news about
Pensions! – but with the continuing fall in the value of investments on
the Stock Market, one wonders how it will all look in a year’s time,
when pension funds have to be realised. However, the really significant
thing in Scotland was the fact that over 850 people turned out to the
meetings which had been organised, and had the chance to hear Diana
Kattan, the Israeli Palestinian Christian woman, and Judith Keshet, the
Israeli Jewish woman, sharing a platform and re-inforcing each other’s
message about what is happening here. Our very sincere thanks go to the
folk who put the effort into organising the meetings. We hope that they
were not disappointed. Before our last meeting, the 4 of us – Diana,
Judith, Joan and myself - had a meal during which we thought about what
might be done to build on the commitment of those who had come to share
in the meetings. Of one thing we were sure – we did not want the
meetings to be both the beginning and end of it all.
We all felt that one very real way in which folk in
the congregations we visited – but indeed folk everywhere - could help
would be to form a small group of two or three people, who would
undertake to read regularly e-mails put out by various organisations
about the situation here. I would hope that the formation of such a
group would be done with the approval of the minister and the leaders of
the congregation. The members of the group could then prepare a short
digest of some of the most significant items of news each week and share
it with their congregation. They, and others, could then also contact
people like the Israeli Embassy in London – or whatever country – to ask
for comment about particular events, and to express their concern about
them.
Information is available for various places,
representing all sorts of views.
Daily news could be obtained from
www.haaretz.
If someone had looked at that for Thursday 6th February, they
may well have found the story of the destruction of a Mosque by
inspectors of the Ministry of the Interior. The incident is part of the
on-going struggle between the Bedouin people in the Negev Desert and the
Government of Israel.
Organisations such as Gush Shalom, an Israeli human
rights group, will provide much material which will help people to be
aware of what is happening on the West Bank and in Gaza –
www.gush-shalom.org.
A slightly different place to look is
www.btselem.org,
the site of another Jewish human rights organisation, which will provide
detailed reports of its investigations into abuses of human rights on
the West Bank and Gaza.
Searching for the Web page of the Scottish
Palestinian Forum will also give a whole series of addresses from which
to obtain material.
At the risk of trying to teach others who are far
better informed than I am, what to do and how to do it, I would
nevertheless make a couple of suggestions:
- there is such a lot of material available, and it would take such
an enormous amount of time to read and check it all, that my advice
would be to select two or three sites at most for regular reading, and
from which digests could be made to circulate to those who might be
interested. Keep the digests short! – but perhaps also give sources
where people could get more information should they want it.
- Should a letter be written to an official body, it is good to make
it quite specific, and ask for a response to specific questions.
Three stories in particular are uppermost in my mind
this week, and I share them with you, though neither of them are
particularly new.
The following is part of a message sent by the Episcopal
Diocese of Jerusalem on 24th January:
There is broken glass everywhere; on the floors,
covering the tables, covering papers, on beds. The Christian leaders of
Gaza have gathered to offer their support and condemn the bombing of St.
Philip’s Episcopal Church, located within the Ahli Arab Hospital
compound. The Church is in the center of the hospital complex, and
surrounded by buildings flying the Red Cross and Anglican flags. All day
a steady flow of friends and visitors came to say ‘Illhamdillah Salameh’,
‘thank God you are safe.’
At about 2:15 last night, Dr. Salah, Ahli Arab
Hospital’s physician on call, awoke to the sound of an explosion in the
distance. The next explosion was nearer and louder, and the electricity
failed. Within the next few minutes he saw the distinctive light of a
missile approaching. As he lay in his third floor bed, he watched as the
missile passed within 10 meters of his head and hit St. Philip’s Church.
It came slowly, and he describes ‘the storm of wind and glass passing
like a train through his bedroom’. There was glass everywhere; in his
bed, in his hair, covering the floor. An elderly woman had arrived at
the emergency room, just prior to the attack. She came because she was
terrified, and was suffering from high blood pressure. The doctor began
to examine her and just then the missile hit next door, and throwing him
to the ground. It took a few minutes for the electrical generator to
come on, and by the time he was able to get to her, she had died. ‘She
died of fear.’
More details of this story are available from the
Diocese : Nancy Dinsmore, Development Office, Episcopal Diocese of
Jerusalem. Email: devedjer@netvision.net.il
The second story in e-mails this week is one that will
have some resonance for those who heard Diana Kattan speak about the
programme to replant olive trees which had been uprooted by members of
the Israeli army or by settlers.
URGENT APPEAL FROM YWCA of PALESTINE and EAST
JERUSALEM YMCA OLIVE TREE CAMPAIGN30 January 2003Dear Friends and
Partners, On 26 January 2003, bulldozers from Neve Daniel , an Israeli
Settlement, near Bethlehem, entered the land of Daoud Nassar, a
Palestinian farmer, and uprooted more than 150 newly-planted olive trees
in order to break ground for a new bypass road. The bulldozers were
“protected” by armed settlers from Neve Daniel. Most of these trees had
been planted through the Olive Tree Campaign on 25 December 2002. This
is yet another step in Israel’s systematic violation of Palestinian
rights. For more information, contact the Advocacy Desk (Joan: olivetree@ywca-palestine.org
or Adnan: adnan@shepherdsfieldymca.org ) .
The article goes on to give details of the history of
the family, the Settlements round its land, and the actions that are
being taken in court to try to protect them.
You will also all know, as I am sure it has been
widely reported, that the Israeli army destroyed two of the main wells
supplying potable water to Rafah in the Gaza Strip. The message I
received was : Date: January 31, 2003 Author: Will Hewitt Area: Gaza
Wednesday night Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF)
destroyed two municipal water wells which provide approximately 50
percent of the water for the city of Rafah. Water use is currently
restricted to 2 hours per day. The Rafah Municipal Department of Water
and Wastewater informed IOF commanders about the exact location of these
wells prior to the attacks. Despite the fact that these wells are
crucial to maintaining basic health and sanitation in Rafah, the IOF
specifically targeted them for demolition. Activists from the
International Solidarity Movement stated that this demolition is yet
another example of the IOF policy of collective punishment: all
residents of the occupied Palestinian territories are routinely targeted
by the IOF, regardless of whether or not they have any involvement with
the armed resistance here.
I am sure that many of you are familiar with this
sort of information, but like me, you wonder what can be done about it.
Perhaps by establishing some sort of regular network for contact with
the political authorities, both of our own countries, and those of
Israel, it may be that support can be given to those who are already
engaged in this sort of action.
A word about Angels from Bethlehem. While in
Scotland, we sold all of the 100 angels we had obtained before we left
Jerusalem. We received orders for approx 400 more! The people at the
Lutheran Church in Bethlehem tell me that they now have orders for about
1,000 angels, which they are in process of making. As you can imagine,
it will take some time for them all to be made – but at least it sort of
guarantees work for one artist for some weeks.
A word about Donations. Since coming back to
Jerusalem, I have not had time to contact many people about current
needs for support. However, I have heard from Sabeel that it has 11
families in immediate need.
A Report about the work of the Shepherd Society in
Bethlehem – an off-shoot of the Bethlehem Bible College – to which we
have give funds on several occasions, gives the following information :
In December 2002 Shepherd Society completed another three-month
installment of its humanitarian relief project. Although implementation
of the project was delayed because of the August and November military
invasions and imposition of 24-hour curfews, Shepherd Society was able
to help 451 families with the purchase of groceries, 346 families with
the payment of utilities bills, and 338 families with temporary
employment. In addition, 191 individuals received medical assistance, 20
severely traumatized school children received intensive counseling, and
7 community social workers received trauma therapy training. Currently,
74 needy families are receiving monthly support payments of $50 to help
with tuition fees, groceries, and utilities bills. Rev. Nihad would like
to see this number increase to at least 100 families enrolled in the
program by the end of 2003.
On Friday morning we had a message from Bethlehem to
say that Nadia, the wife of Hana Azar, formerly employed at St Andrew’s,
had suddenly died that morning. Her funeral had been arranged for 1500
hours that afternoon. 4 of us left Jerusalem about 1400 hours, to make
sure that we would be on time for the service – just 5 miles away, but
on the other side of the check point. We were surprised to find that we
were the only vehicle at the check point, and it took but a minute to
pass through it. In Bethlehem we wondered why we saw so few people, even
for a Friday, the day of prayers at Mosques. Later we heard that the day
had started normally, with the kids going to school, people to work etc.
Then about 0830 – 0900 hours, the Israeli army had sent round jeeps
saying that people should go home, as the Curfew was being imposed
again. Just like that!
Hana’s wife had wakened on Friday morning not feeling
too well. She had been to the doctor on Thursday about a cough, and had
been given medicine. By about 0900 hours, she was obviously not at all
well, and so the family called for an Ambulance. It could not come, the
people said, because of the Curfew. Doctors could not come because of
the Curfew. A neighbour took Hana, his wife and some of the family, to
the Hospital, but she was dead on arrival at the hospital. It is
doubtful if the arrival of an ambulance would have made any difference,
but just the fact that it could not come when needed is a small
illustration of what life is like for the people on the West Bank.
Thankfully, despite the Curfew, the funeral was able
to go ahead without any interference by the Israeli army. Following
prayers in the house, we all made our way to the Church of the Nativity
for the Liturgy. It was the first time that we had actually shared in a
“regular” service in this Church, and it gave a new dimension to our
understanding of it as a “working” church of the Greek Orthodox
community, and not just a historical shrine.
War conversation is everywhere – what will happen,
when etc. and how will it affect us here. There is still a certain
incredulity that one nation is about to be invaded because it ignores UN
Resolutions, while another nation which is also ignoring UN Resolutions
is seen as a partner in the war. It is not what you do, but who your
friends are, that matters.
Domestic politics continue, with the negotiations
getting under way to form a Coalition government. Will Labour join the
Government? Will it stay out? Etc
The Economy is in difficulty : (Wed 5th
Feb headline) Record budget deficit is double January forecast.
Saturday morning : Joan and I are off for a walk
(despite the cold and the rain), led by Father Jerry Murphy-O’Connor,
hopefully to learn something of the City of David! (
For us, it is good to be back – I hope you feel it is
good to get our letters again!
God bless. Love from us both.
Joan and Clarence
Sign Joan saw in Ram
top
Circular Letter No 112
11th January 2003
Saturday 4th January. We did make it to the Christmas Party at Al
Shurooq. One of the anomalies in the Curfew that is in force in
Bethlehem – and other areas – is that some people find ways of
circumventing it, and the army is well aware of what is happening. So,
we were able to drive to the outskirts of Beit Jala, park the car along
with many others, walk over a mound of earth and rubble, and take a taxi
the kilometre or so to the school. There we had a delicious lunch, and
the children sang some carols while waiting for Santa Claus to come.
When the familiar figure appeared, every child had a parcel, and it was
magic seeing them open them, and feel what was inside. Most of them then
brought them to let Helen see what was they had been given – as you can
imagine, there was great fun.
Sunday 5th January. Curfew still imposed on Bethlehem. No work,
no schools, no official church services, no people officially able to go
to prayers at Mosques. John Gang and his family live in Bethlehem, but
they appeared at church – which was just as well, as Chang-Lim is our
organist. Being the first Sunday of the year, John had just decided that
he and his family were coming. As they have foreign passports, they were
allowed to travel.
This week, John is leading a group of Palestinians to Korea, to meet
church and civic leaders. The realities of travel for them are that
unless they have official papers allowing them to be in Israel, they
cannot use Ben Gurion airport. So, some of the delegation will travel
from Ben Gurion as they have such papers, while the others will have to
go to Amman and travel from there. They all plan to meet in Amsterdam to
continue their journey. However, even to get to Amman is not easy, as
the Jordanian authorities are being very strict in whom they are
allowing in to Jordan. They do not want Palestinians to cross into
Jordan and then become refugees there. This would add to their problems,
while alleviating the problems of the Israeli government.
In the evening we heard of the bombs in Tel Aviv, with such devastating
results. Each time such an attack occurs, there are the anticipated
responses from both the Israeli government and the Palestinian
Authority. You will have heard them all, as we have. Suffice it to say
that few think any response from either set of leaders will, in the
present circumstances, lead to any real attempt to deal with the
underlying problem.
IRAQ. People returning from visits to Jordan speak of the great anxiety
of the population there about the forthcoming US led war against Iraq.
It is not “Will the war occur?” Rather it appears to be “When the war
occurs.” Here it is also very much “When the war occurs” rather than
“Will the war occur?”
For the Church of Scotland, this poses problems, some of which are (in
no particular order of importance):
What to do with staff who work here, such as Bryson and May Arthur at
Ibillin, Karen Anderson, Chris and Sue Mottershead and Irene Wilson at
Tabeetha, Fred and Diana Hibbert at Tiberias, and ourselves. Should we
be withdrawn in the event of hostilities? In one sense, for our own
potential safety, that would seem logical. On the other hand, the people
with whom we work on a daily basis, and the people for whom we have
pastoral care, will not be able to leave. Last week in Bethlehem, I was
asked directly by a Christian person I was visiting if we would be
leaving in the event of war. Yesterday we made our first small
preparation – we bought 12 bottles of water!!!
Chris Mottershead, the Principal, representing the Church of Scotland,
has the responsibility of running Tabeetha School at Jaffa. Along with
all other schools in the country, it has had to start on the road to
making preparations in case war does occur. Talking with him about the
School, I gleaned the following information. The local security officer
has visited the school twice. A Security Emergency System has now been
installed which links the school immediately to Fire, First Aid, and
Security Services. The Bomb Shelter will take half of the children –
what will be the advice/instructions of the Ministry of Education with
regard to the other half? When school resumes after the Christmas break,
representatives of the Israeli Army will come to instruct the staff in
preparation for emergencies, and then staff will instruct the children.
There will also be a session with Army personnel instructing the
children in the use of gas masks.
In the Herald Tribune recently there was an article about the way in
which the US would administer Iraq after the war is over, and Saddam
Hussein ha |